October 19, 2021

Volume XI, Number 292


October 18, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York Enacts New Limitations Period for Water Supplier Contamination Claims

On November 4, 2019, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo signed into law a statute of limitations bill designed to make it easier for public water providers to file lawsuits relating to alleged contamination of their water supply wells. The new provision allows a water supplier three years to file suit from the date on which it “last detect[s]” a contaminant in a given supply well. N.Y. CPLR § 214-h(2) (S.B. 3337/A.B.5477). This contrasts with the previously applicable limitations period, which required a plaintiff to file suit within three years of when it discovered or “should have” discovered an injury to its property. N.Y. CPLR § 214-c.

Specifically, newly enacted Section 214-h of the New York Civil Practice Law & Rules (CPLR) provides that, for actions seeking damages for injuries to water supplies, public or wholesale water suppliers must file suit within three years from the latest of either:

  • The detection of a contaminant in raw water;

  • The last wrongful act by any person who contributed to the contamination; or

  • The last detection of a contaminant in raw water. 

To trigger the limitations period, the contaminant must be present in excess of any notification level, action level, maximum contaminant level, or maximum contaminant level goal established by the New York State Department of Health or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Notably, the new statute of limitations applies to each well and plant intake, and for each contaminant, separately. As a result, the expiration of the statute of limitations based on a detection of a contaminant in one well may not preclude a water provider from bringing an action based on subsequent detections in one or more other wells.

Prior to the enactment of this provision, water provider claims regarding contamination of their supply wells (and contamination-related property damage claims by other plaintiffs) were governed by CPLR Section 214-c. Under that section, the statute of limitations runs from the earlier of the “date of discovery of the injury by the plaintiff” or “the date when through the exercise of reasonable diligence the injury should have been discovered.” N.Y. CPLR § 214-c(2). The new provision, which is specific to public water providers, may allow certain claims to proceed that would have been time-barred under Section 214-c.

The effort to adopt a limitation period specific to water supply contamination claims was led in the State Senate by Sen. Jim Gaughran, who formerly served as Chairman of the Board of Suffolk County Water Authority (SCWA), the largest supplier of groundwater in the United States. SCWA has filed at least four major lawsuits seeking damages for alleged contamination of its water supply wells.

The exact scope and effect of this new provision will no doubt be subject to interpretation by the courts as water suppliers on Long Island and elsewhere in the state continue to assert product liability, toxic tort, and other claims based on detections of contaminants – particularly so-called emerging (or previously unregulated) contaminants – in their supply wells. As the contours of the new law take shape, defendants will need to carefully analyze the availability of limitations-based and other defenses.

© 2021 Beveridge & Diamond PC National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 316

About this Author

Daniel M. Krainin Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond New York, NY

Dan deploys more than two decades of environmental litigation experience to resolve clients’ legal and business challenges.

Primarily focused on environmental and toxic tort litigation, Dan helps clients successfully resolve groundwater contamination, hazardous waste site remediation, natural resource damages, permit defense and product-related matters. He enjoys using his skills as a litigator to help clients solve environmental problems.

Among his many wins, Dan successfully led a team that defeated an emergency challenge to a permit that Dan’s client needed to continue its...

212-702 5417
Megan R. Brillault Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond New York, NY

Megan Brillault represents individuals, trade associations and businesses, including Fortune 500 companies, in complex civil and criminal environmental and toxic tort litigation, including class and mass actions.

Versed in the complexities of e-discovery, Megan helps clients implement cost-effective and fast-paced litigation solutions for all phases of discovery through post-trial proceedings. She also promotes diversity and inclusion within the firm and the legal community, working with the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity and various women's organizations.


Anthony G. Papetti Environmental Litigation Attorney Beveridge & Diamond New York, NY

Anthony’s practice focuses on general environmental litigation and automotive regulatory compliance.

For the past two years, his experience has been extensively involved in the Department of Justice-appointed Independent Corporate Compliance Monitor and Audit matter in connection with the Volkswagen AG diesel emissions proceedings. During this experience, Anthony has gained tremendous insight into complex corporate compliance management systems and the automotive product development process, including both domestic and international vehicle emissions certification...