April 1, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 91

Advertisement
Advertisement

March 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

March 29, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

NJ Expands Law Against Discrimination to Further Protect Private-Sector Workers Over 70

On Oct. 5, 2021, Gov. Phil Murphy of New Jersey signed legislation expanding available protections under New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination (LAD) to private-sector workers over 70 years of age. Prior to the newly enacted amendments, private employers were permitted to refuse to hire or promote an individual for the sole reason that the person was over age 70. Similar rules permitted certain state employers to require mandatory retirement for individuals who reached a retirement age “bear[ing] a manifest relationship to the employment in question.”

The amendments not only eliminate these previously permissible employment practices but also expand available remedies for claims of forced retirement. Under the amended LAD, a private-sector employee claiming to have been unlawfully denied employment or promotion due to their age, even if over 70, as well as any employee claiming to have been forced to retire because they reached age 70, may now pursue all available remedies under LAD, including compensatory and punitive damages, reinstatement with back pay, attorneys’ fees, and interest.

Sponsors of the bill cited New Jersey’s aging workforce and the reality that people may need to work well beyond the age of 65 as factors motivating the amendments. NJ’s LAD already prohibited age discrimination, including discrimination motivated by youth, but the once permissible “upper ceiling” of 70 years old is no longer a viable basis for private-sector employment decisions of any nature.

The amendments take effect immediately, and employers should promptly review any “mandatory retirement” and related severance policies to ensure compliance with these changes. Employers will also be wise to carefully consider employment decisions affecting older workers to assess compliance with these new rules.

©2023 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 280
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Michael Slocum, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, New Jersey, Labor and Employment, Litigation Attorney
Of Counsel

Michael J. Slocum focuses his practice on labor and employment law, including the defense of discrimination, retaliation, wrongful discharge and whistleblower claims. Michael has represented employers in a broad array of industries, including health care and life sciences, pharmaceutical, private security, and retail, and has experience defending against both individual employee claims and class actions.

Prior to joining the firm, Michael practiced in the litigation department of a national firm focused on labor and employment matters in the...

973-360-7900
Noel Lesica, Greenberg Traurig Law Firm, New Jersey, Labor and Employment Attorney
Associate

Noel A. Lesica provides clients with insight into employment law issues with the added perspective gained by her experience working in-house for major pharmaceutical companies.

Noel began her career in private practice, specializing in employment litigation and counseling, representing corporate clients on a wide range of workplace issues including discrimination, retaliation, employee discipline and the termination process.

973-443-3248