October 24, 2021

Volume XI, Number 297

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

OCIE Releases Risk Alert Relating to Principal Transaction and Agency Cross Trade Compliance Issues

On September 4, 2019, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) issued a risk alert identifying common principal trading and agency cross trading compliance issues observed by OCIE staff in adviser examinations during the past three years. Principal trades and agency cross trades when acting as a broker are governed by Section 206(3) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

The risk alert categorized the compliance deficiencies as follows:

  • Failure to meet specific requirements of Section 206(3). Advisers, acting as principal for their own accounts, purchased or sold securities in transactions with individual clients without recognizing that such principal trades were subject to Section 206(3) of the Advisers Act and therefore did not make the required written disclosures to clients or obtain the required client consents. Other advisers recognized that they had engaged in principal trades but failed to meet all of the requirements of Section 206(3) by: (1) failing to obtain appropriate prior client consent for each principal trade; or (2) failing to provide sufficient disclosure regarding the potential conflict of interests and transaction terms. OCIE also observed advisers that obtained client consent to a principal trade after completion of the transaction.

  • Failure to identify principal transactions relating to pooled investment vehicles. Advisers effected trades between advisory clients and an affiliated pooled investment vehicle, but failed to recognize that the advisers’ significant ownership interests in the pooled investment vehicle (typically greater than 25%) would cause the transaction to be subject to Section 206(3). Advisers also effected principal trades between themselves and pooled investment vehicles, but did not obtain effective consent from the pooled investment vehicle prior to completing the transactions.

  • Agency cross trade activity despite contrary disclosures to clients. Advisers engaged in agency cross trades in reliance on Rule 206(3)-2 despite having disclosed to clients that they would not engage in such transactions.

  • Agency cross trade activity without documentation. Advisers effected agency cross trades purportedly in reliance on Rule 206(3)-2 but could not produce any documentation substantiating their compliance with the written consent, confirmation or disclosure requirements of the rule.

  • Failure to institute policies and procedures. OCIE observed advisers that either did not have policies and procedures relating to Section 206(3) or failed to follow them.

The risk alert encourages advisers to review their written policies and procedures and the implementation of those policies and procedures to ensure that they are compliant with the principal trading and agency cross transaction provisions of the Advisers Act and the rules thereunder.

OCIE’s announcement and a link to the risk alert is available here.

© 2021 Vedder PriceNational Law Review, Volume IX, Number 275
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jacob Tiedt,Vedder Price law firm investment services attorney
Shareholder

Jacob C. Tiedt is a Shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the Investment Services group.

Mr. Tiedt’s practice includes the representation of registered mutual funds, closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds; private funds; investment advisers; and other financial institutions on a broad range of regulatory, governance and compliance matters. Mr. Tiedt regularly counsels clients on matters relating to SEC registration, disclosure and compliance; shareholder solicitation; NYSE, Nasdaq and FINRA regulation; corporate governance; and board administration. Mr....

312-609-7697
John Marten Investment Attorney Vedder Price Law FIrm
Shareholder

John S. Marten, a Shareholder in the Chicago office of Vedder Price, has substantial experience representing clients in the investment management industry.

As a member of the firm’s Investment Services group, Mr. Marten counsels clients on a wide variety of matters involving the application of the federal securities laws to investment companies, investment advisers and broker-dealers. He has significant experience counseling investment company clients with respect to new products and was recently involved in the creation of two mutual funds...

(312) 609 7753
Nathaniel Segal Investment Attorney Vedder Price Law Firm
Counsel

Nathaniel Segal is counsel at Vedder Price and a member of the Investment Services group. He focuses his practice on investment companies and investment advisers in connection with the organization and operation of investment products and services, including traditional mutual funds, closed-end investment companies (including interval funds and listed closed-end funds), variable insurance products and registered hedge funds, as well as mutual funds utilizing complex hedging and absolute return strategies. Mr. Segal has experience in conducting transactional due diligence...

(312) 609 7747
Adam Goldman Investment Attorney Vedder Price
Associate

Adam S. Goldman is an Associate in the Chicago office of Vedder Price and a member of the firm’s Investment Services practice group.

Prior to joining Vedder Price, Mr. Goldman practiced at a boutique financial services firm, representing broker-dealers, investment advisers, commodity pool operators, private equity funds, and other investment services clients in transactional, litigation, and compliance matters. Mr. Goldman also counseled public companies on required filings under the 1933 and 1934 Acts and other regulatory issues.

While in law school, Mr. Goldman competed in...

312 609 7731
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement