January 29, 2022

Volume XII, Number 29

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 27, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Ohio Supreme Court Rules on DMA's Notice Requirements for Abandonment of Mineral Interests

On December 17, the Supreme Court of Ohio held in Gerrity v. Chervenak that the circumstances of each respective case will control the efforts a surface owner must take before resorting to notice by publication under the Dormant Mineral Act (DMA). 

In Gerrity, Timothy Gerrity sought a judgment quieting title and declaring him the owner of the mineral estate underlying a 108-acre property in Guernsey County. John Chervenak—trustee of the Chervenak Family Trust, owner of the surface estate—claimed that the mineral estate belonged to the trust because it had been deemed abandoned under the DMA. Mr. Gerrity, conversely, claimed that Mr. Chervenak’s use of the DMA was ineffective because he failed to comply with the Act’s notice requirements. The Guernsey County Court of Common Pleas awarded summary judgment to Mr. Chervenak, and the Fifth District Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. 

The Supreme Court of Ohio held that Mr. Chervenak complied with the DMA’s notice requirements. In so doing, the Court rejected Mr. Gerrity’s argument that a surface owner must identify all mineral interest holders and attempt service by certified mail on each because the DMA acknowledges that identification of all mineral interest holders may not be possible and therefore permits notice by other means (i.e., publication). The Court declined to adopt a bright-line rule detailing the efforts a surface owner must expend before resorting to notice by publication, leaving the creation of such a rule to the legislature. Nevertheless, the Court provided some guidance by reviewing Mr. Chervenak’s notice efforts. Prior to resorting to service by publication, Mr. Chervenak searched the records of Guernsey County where the property was located and learned that the mineral interest holder of record had a Cleveland address. Mr. Chervenak then searched in the Cuyahoga County Recorder’s Office and Probate Court for records that would establish a more recent address or heirship information. Having found none, he mailed notice to the Cleveland address, which was returned undelivered. The Court concluded that those efforts were reasonably diligent and that Mr. Chervenak properly resorted to service by publication. The Court also concluded that, under the circumstances, Mr. Chervenak was not required to perform an online search.

In conclusion, the Court held that a “[r]eview of public-property and court records in the county where the land subject to a severed mineral interest is located will generally establish a baseline of reasonable diligence in identifying the holder or holders of the severed mineral interest.” The Court emphasized, however, that whether additional efforts are necessary “will depend on the circumstances of each case.”

© Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume X, Number 358
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jason Lucas, Energy Attorney, Steptoe Johnson Law Firm
Member

Jason Lucas focuses his practice in the areas of energy and mineral law. Mr. Lucas regularly assists clients with mineral title examinations and title opinions and coordinating and performing due diligence and mineral acquisitions throughout Ohio and Pennsylvania. Mr. Lucas also advocates for client interest through his leadership positions in various regional and national oil and gas associations.  Mr. Lucas is one of the founders of the Appalachian Basin Association of Division  Order Analysts and serves as an Officer of NADOA, the National Association of Division...

(304) 231-0464
Dallas Kratzer Litigation Attorney Steptoe Johnson Ohio
Of Counsel

Dallas Kratzer cut his teeth in the courts, working for five years in the federal courts, including the Fourth and Sixth Circuits of the United States Courts of Appeals.  An avid lacrosse player, Dallas is as competitive on the field as in the courtroom and knows how important it is to understand and predict how  his opponent will behave.  As a law clerk, Dallas gained valuable insight into the “inside baseball” of the court system, as well as the most efficient and effective way to present a position and make a convincing argument.  Clients appreciate that Dallas can...

(614) 458-9827
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement