January 29, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 29


January 27, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Pending Illinois Legislation Will Restrict Employers’ Use Of Non-Compete, Non-Solicit Agreements


  • Senate Bill 672, when signed by the governor, will amend the Illinois Freedom to Work Act, which governs non-compete and non-solicit agreements

  • Under the new law, Illinois employers that use non-compete and non-solicit agreements will be subject to new restrictions and requirements

  • Illinois employers should consider promptly reviewing their existing agreements and related practices to ensure they will comply with the new requirements

On May 31, 2021, the Illinois legislature unanimously passed Senate Bill 672, which is expected to be signed into law by Gov. JB Pritzker. Once signed, SB 672 will be effective Jan. 1, 2022, amending the Illinois Freedom to Work Act and making numerous significant changes that affect non-compete and non-solicit agreements for Illinois employees. 

Employers should consider promptly reviewing their existing form agreements and related practices in light of the pending law to ensure they will remain legally enforceable once the new law goes into effect.

Key Provisions of the Law

SB 672 is a bi-partisan effort by the Illinois legislature to strike a balance between employee and employer interests, although employers may well view the law as pro-employee.

The law’s key provisions include:

• Effective date – The law applies to restrictive covenant agreements entered into after Jan. 1, 2022. Because the law has no retroactive application, it will not impact any agreement entered into prior to that date.

• Increased annual earnings thresholds – The law will increase the current earnings thresholds and prohibit non-compete agreements for employees who earn $75,000 per year or less, and also prohibit non-solicit agreements for employees who earn $45,000 per year or less. These thresholds will increase in future years to account for inflation. The law defines “earnings” to include all forms of taxable compensation that are reflected on an employee’s Form W-2, including salary, bonuses, and commissions.

• COVID-19-related terminations – The law prohibits enforcing agreements against employees who lose their jobs because of the COVID-19 pandemic “or under circumstances that are similar to the pandemic”, unless the employee receives compensation equivalent to his or her base salary for the full restrictive period, minus any compensation received during that period from new employment.  The law does not provide any guidance regarding what circumstances would be “similar to the pandemic.”

• Attorney’s fees – The law authorizes employees to recover attorney’s fees if they prevail in a claim brought by an employer seeking to enforce an agreement

• Attorney General enforcement – The law empowers the Illinois Attorney General to investigate potential violations of the law and initiate litigation, in which a court may impose civil penalties on an offending employer

• Review period – The law requires that employees be given at least 14 days to review an agreement and decide whether to sign it; the agreement is void unless the employer advises the employee in writing that the employee has a right to consult with an attorney before signing an agreement. Employees are free to sign an agreement before the end of the 14-day period, so long as they do so voluntarily.

• Sufficient consideration – The law codifies existing case law under which Illinois courts have ruled that, unless an employee receives some professional or financial benefit in exchange for signing an agreement (e.g., a cash payment or additional vacation time), the employee must work for the employer for at least two years after signing an agreement for it to be enforceable

• Legitimate business interest – The law provides that when assessing whether an employer has a legitimate business interest sufficient to warrant a post-employment restrictive covenant, courts must consider the totality of the facts and circumstances, with each situation being assessed on a case-by-case basis

• Judicial reform of overly broad restrictions – The law provides that a court may exercise its discretion and choose to reform or eliminate provisions of an agreement that are overly broad, rather than invalidating an agreement

Key Exceptions to the Law

The law contains a number of significant exceptions, including:

• Confidentiality and trade secret agreements – The law does not apply to confidentiality, trade secret, and invention assignment agreements. These types of agreements will continue to be governed by existing laws and principles.

• Sales of business – The law does not apply to agreements that are entered into in connection with the acquisition or disposition of an ownership interest in a business

• Garden leave provisions – The law does not apply to “garden leave” clauses that require an employee to provide advance notice of termination of employment, with the employee remaining employed and compensated during the notice period

• No reapplication clauses – The law does not apply to “no reapplication” clauses that are commonly included in separation agreements and prohibit the separating employees from reapplying for employment in the future

Employer Takeaways

When assessing the impact of the new law, employers should consider potential changes to ensure their agreements and practices will remain enforceable and viable; minimally, agreements entered into after Jan. 1, 2022 will need to include new language regarding the 14-day review period and right to consult with an attorney. Although the law does not impact agreements that are currently in effect, there may be circumstances in which an employer wishes to enter into a new, modified agreement.

© 2023 BARNES & THORNBURG LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 179

About this Author

David G. Weldon Labor & Employment Attorney Barnes & Thornburg Chicago, IL
Of Counsel

Business owners, in-house counsel and human tesources professionals turn to David Weldon for pragmatic, strategic advice regarding labor and employment law matters that takes into account legal risk and their ultimate business objectives. David advises and partners with employers of all sizes, assesses and helps to minimize liability, resolves disputes, and finds solutions for day-to-day issues involving employees and unions.

David defends employers in state and federal courts across the country in single-plaintiff and class and collective action litigation involving trade secrets,...

David B. Ritter Barnes Thornburg Law Firm Labor and Employment Law Attorney Chicago

David B. Ritter is a partner in the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP. He is a member of the firm’s Labor & Employment Law Department and co-chairs the Logistics and Transportation Practice Group. He represents management nationwide in virtually all areas of labor and employment law, including employment discrimination and harassment claims, wage and hour disputes, non-compete, trade secret and restrictive covenants and employment torts.

With nearly 30 years of experience representing public and private companies, Mr. Ritter has...

Norma W. Zeitler, Barnes Thornburg Law Firm, Chicago, Employment Law Attorney

Norma W. Zeitler is a partner in the Chicago office of Barnes & Thornburg LLP and a member of the Labor and Employment Department and the Associations and Foundations Practice Group. She concentrates her practice on employment law, and represents employers in the defense of employment discrimination, retaliatory discharge, breach-of-contract, workplace tort, and restrictive covenant cases in federal and state courts and administrative agencies. She also provides day-to-day counseling for employers on all matters that impact the employment relationship.

Kenneth J. Yerkes Employment lawyer Barnes Thornburg

Chair of the firm’s Labor and Employment Department for two decades, Ken Yerkes has spent over 30 years successfully fighting for his clients' rights and business objectives at the bargaining table, in arbitration and federal and state court, as well as in plants across the country through proactive training, counseling and union avoidance campaigns.

Ken's ability to transform complex scenarios into workable strategies has earned him not only his clients' trust, but also acclaim as one of the country’s recognized leaders in labor and employment law. He is a fellow...