December 5, 2019

December 05, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 04, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 03, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

December 02, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Private Attorney General Act (PAGA) Waivers may be Enforceable in Federal Courts

In the June 2014 Iskanian decision, the California Supreme Court carved out an exception to the general rule that class action waivers in arbitration agreements are valid, and concluded that the right to bring representative Private Attorney General Act (“PAGA”) claims cannot be waived through arbitration agreements. PAGA allows individual workers to pursue Labor Code violations against employers in a representative action on behalf of government authorities.

The Supreme Court’s “carve out” for PAGA claims in Iskanian was soundly rejected by a federal court on October 17, 2014. Langston v. 20/20 Companies, Case No. EDCV 14-1360 JGB (C.D.Cal., Oct. 17, 2014). Judge Bernal, a federal judge in the Central District, granted the motion of 20/20 Communications to compel arbitration in a putative class action and found that the plaintiffs were bound by arbitration agreements requiring individual arbitration of employment claims, including PAGA claims.

Judge Bernal became the latest federal judge to rule against the California Supreme Court’s Iskanian decision in finding that the PAGA claims were preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). Judge Bernal found that the FAA “preempts California’s rule against arbitration agreements that waive an employee’s right to bring representative PAGA claims.”

Four federal district courts have now found preemption by the FAA. Although California state courts are bound by the Iskanian decision holding that the provisions are unenforceable as a matter of public policy, each federal district court is free to analyze the issue independently. As a result, these federal decisions have injected uncertainty regarding the future of PAGA arbitration waivers. Given the federal trend favoring the enforcement of arbitration provisions, and the recent federal court decisions, California employers facing this issue likely will remove their cases to federal court, whenever possible.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2019


About this Author

Dale R. Kuykendall, Labor and Employment Attorney, Jackson Lewis Law Firm

Dale R. Kuykendall is a Principal in the Sacramento, California, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. His practice focuses on advising and counseling employers in the hiring, supervision and termination of employees.

In addition to his advice and counsel practice, Mr. Kuykendall has successfully litigated a wide variety of employment cases through trial, including claims of unfair competition, breach of contract, discrimination, harassment and wrongful termination.

Prior to joining Jackson Lewis...

Heath A. Havey, Labor and Employment Attorney, Jackson Lewis Law Firm

Heath A. Havey is an Associate in the Sacramento, California office of Jackson Lewis P.C.

Mr. Havey exclusively represents management in workplace law and related litigation. Mr. Havey also defends management in statewide class action litigation. Mr. Havey has special expertise in advising multinational companies in labor and employment matters related to Japan and United States operations, including compliance, transactional matters, mass employment mergers and acquisitions, cross-border litigation, transnational contracts, globalization, and proactive employment advice and counsel. Mr. Havey is fluent in Japanese and has a comprehensive understanding of Japanese employment practices and laws.