January 28, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 28


January 27, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 26, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 25, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

SEC’s Division of Examinations Issues Risk Alert on ESG Investing

On April 9, 2021, the SEC’s Division of Examinations (formerly the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations) issued a risk alert highlighting the staff’s observations from recent examinations of investment advisers, registered investment companies and private funds offering environmental, social and governance (ESG) products and services. In light of the increased investor demand for ESG products and services and the variability of ESG definitions and terms, the risk alert elaborates on the focus of future examinations, as well as on deficiencies and best practices observed in past examinations.

The staff stated that future examinations of firms engaging in ESG investing will focus on, among other things, the following:

  • The firm’s policies, procedures and practices related to ESG investing and the use of ESG-related terminology, including the processes for ensuring that the selection of investments and proxy voting are consistent with ESG disclosures and marketing materials;

  • The firm’s regulatory filings, websites, reports to any sponsors of global ESG frameworks the firm has committed to follow, client presentations, responses to due diligence questionnaires, requests for proposals and client/investor-facing documents; and

  • The firm’s compliance policies and procedures and their implementation, as well as compliance oversight and the review of ESG investing practices and disclosures.

The staff found the following deficiencies in its examinations of firms engaging in ESG investing:

  • Portfolio management practices that were inconsistent with ESG disclosures;

  • Inadequate controls regarding ESG-related investing guidelines, mandates and restrictions;

  • Proxy voting that was inconsistent with stated ESG approaches;

  • Unsubstantiated or misleading claims regarding ESG approaches;

  • Inadequate controls to ensure consistency between actual firm practices and ESG-related disclosures and marketing;

  • Lack of policies and procedures addressing ESG investing analyses, decision-making processes or compliance review and oversight; and

  • Compliance personnel with limited knowledge of ESG-investment analyses, resulting in less effective compliance programs.

In contrast to such deficiencies, the staff observed the following effective practices related to ESG investing:

  • Clear and precise disclosure that has been tailored to the firm’s specific approach to ESG investing and that is aligned with the firm’s actual practices;

  • Detailed policies and procedures that address ESG investing, including specific documentation to be completed at various stages of the investment process; an

  • Knowledgeable compliance personnel who are integrated into the firm’s ESG-related processes.

In light of these observations, the staff advised firms to review their disclosures and other public statements to ensure that they are consistent with the firm’s practices, to ensure the consistent application of ESG investing principles throughout the firm and that these principles are adequately addressed in the firm’s compliance program, and to document and maintain records relating to the ESG investing process.

The risk alert is available here.

© 2023 Vedder PriceNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 152

About this Author

John Marten Investment Attorney Vedder Price Law FIrm

John S. Marten, a Shareholder in the Chicago office of Vedder Price, has substantial experience representing clients in the investment management industry.

As a member of the firm’s Investment Services group, Mr. Marten counsels clients on a wide variety of matters involving the application of the federal securities laws to investment companies, investment advisers and broker-dealers. He has significant experience counseling investment company clients with respect to new products and was recently involved in the creation of two mutual funds...

(312) 609 7753
Nathaniel Segal Investment Attorney Vedder Price Law Firm

Nathaniel Segal is counsel at Vedder Price and a member of the Investment Services group. He focuses his practice on investment companies and investment advisers in connection with the organization and operation of investment products and services, including traditional mutual funds, closed-end investment companies (including interval funds and listed closed-end funds), variable insurance products and registered hedge funds, as well as mutual funds utilizing complex hedging and absolute return strategies. Mr. Segal has experience in conducting transactional due diligence...

(312) 609 7747
Jacob Tiedt,Vedder Price law firm investment services attorney

Jacob C. Tiedt is a Shareholder at Vedder Price and a member of the Investment Services group.

Mr. Tiedt’s practice includes the representation of registered mutual funds, closed-end funds and exchange-traded funds; private funds; investment advisers; and other financial institutions on a broad range of regulatory, governance and compliance matters. Mr. Tiedt regularly counsels clients on matters relating to SEC registration, disclosure and compliance; shareholder solicitation; NYSE, Nasdaq and FINRA regulation; corporate governance; and board administration. Mr....

John M. Sanders Investment Lawyer Vedder Price

John M. Sanders is an Associate at Vedder Price and a member of the firm's Investment Services group.

Mr. Sanders focuses on advising clients on mutual funds, private placements, sale transactions and regulatory issues.

While in law school, Mr. Sanders was a judicial extern for the Honorable David J. Novak, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia and a law clerk with the Baltimore City State’s Attorney’s Office. He also served as Lead Articles Editor for the William & Mary Law Review.

(202) 312 3332