February 24, 2021

Volume XI, Number 55

Advertisement

February 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 23, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 22, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Sixth Circuit Strikes Down Contractually Shortened Limitations Period for Claims Under ADA, ADEA

The statute of limitation periods in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) give rise to substantive, non-waivable rights rendering a contractually shortened limitation period unenforceable, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit has held. Thompson v. Fresh Products, LLC, No. 20-3060 (Jan. 15, 2021).

The Sixth Circuit has jurisdiction over Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee.

Previously, the Sixth Circuit held that a contractual provision that shortens the time for bringing a suit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act is unenforceable because, “where statutes … contain their own limitations periods, the limitation period should be treated as a substantive right” that may not be waived. Logan v. MGM Grand Detroit Casino, 939 F.3d 824, 829 (6th Cir. 2019). The objective of this decision was to encourage pre-suit cooperation with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and ensure uniform application of Title VII across jurisdictions. (A charge must be filed within 180 days, or 300 days in certain jurisdictions, after the adverse employment action.) In Thompson, the Court expands Logan’s restrictions on shortened statute of limitations agreements to include cases brought under the ADA and ADEA.

The Court reasoned that, because the language of the ADA expressly incorporates Title VII’s procedures, limitations period, and remedies (see 42 U.S.C § 12117(a)), the ADA’s time limitation is similarly a substantive right that cannot be waived.

Likewise, the ADEA contains provisions that embody the Court’s objective in the Logan decision. The ADEA includes an independent statute of limitations period, emphasizes the importance of the cooperative process with the EEOC, and provides that any right or claim under the ADEA cannot be waived unless it is knowing and voluntary. Based on these considerations, the statute of limitations in the ADEA also cannot be shortened by contract, the Court ruled.

Employers should consider reviewing any statute of limitations language in their employment applications or handbooks to ensure compliance.

Advertisement
Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2020National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 20
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Emily Petroski Litigator Jackson Lewis Detroit & Grand Rapids Law Firm
Principal

Emily M. Petroski is a Principal in the Detroit, Michigan, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She is the Litigation Manager for the firm's Detroit and Grand Rapids, Michigan, offices.

Ms. Petroski’s practice focuses on employment litigation, as well as advice and counsel on all employment and labor issues. She has handled labor and employment cases throughout the Midwest, successfully defending some of the nation’s largest corporations.

Ms. Petroski has significant experience advising clients and handling multi-plaintiff claims under Title VII, the...

248-936-1922
Associate

Franceska N. Edinger is an associate in the Detroit, Michigan office of Jackson Lewis P.C. While attending law school, Franceska received several awards for her appellate brief writing, including the 2018 Law Review Best Brief Competition and third place in the Michigan State University appellate moot court competition. Furthermore, she worked as a teaching assistant for the Legal Research and Writing Department throughout her second and third years. Franceska competed on two moot court teams including the American Bar Association (national) competition and...

248-936-1926
Advertisement
Advertisement