June 7, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 158


June 06, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 04, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

TCPA Regulatory Update — Commission Issues Clarification on “No Data” Reports from Reassigned Numbers Database

The Federal Communications Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (“Bureau”) issued clarified guidance for callers who use the Reassigned Numbers Database (“RND”). The Public Notice explained that, going forward, the RND will return a value of “yes” – meaning the number has been reassigned – when the queried number is in the database and the disconnect date provided in the search is the same as or before the permanent disconnect date in the RND. However, the RND will return a value of “no” – meaning it has not been reassigned – if the queried number is in the database and the date provided in the search is after the permanent disconnect date in the RND, or if the number is not in the RND and the date the caller provides is on or after January 27, 2021. The RND will only return a value of “no data” if a queried number and the permanent disconnect date are not contained in the RND and the date the caller provides in their search is on or before January 27, 2021.

The Bureau’s new guidance is an improvement over the previous operation of the RND, which as we reported, went live on November 1, 2021. Under the operation of the RND so far, unless the “last good” date of a queried telephone number – the last date the caller believes the phone number belonged to the called party – was later than October 15, 2021, the RND has been returning a “no data” value. Callers do not receive the benefit of the RND’s safe harbor for calls made to numbers that return “no data.” Thus, many callers were left questioning the usefulness of the RND given the large volume of “no data” reports. The Bureau’s new guidance will maximize the potential of the RND since it will now return the greatest amount of actionable information callers may rely on for protection from Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) liability when calling numbers that have given consent but may have been reassigned.

As we explained previously, because callers are protected from TCPA liability only when they use the RND and only for errors in the RND itself, callers that make a large number of calls should set up a process for checking the RND before placing those calls.

©1994-2023 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 24

About this Author

Russell H. Fox, Communications Attorney, Mintz Levin, Regulatory Approvals

With over 35 years in the wireless telecommunications industry, Russell is among the most experienced wireless communications attorneys in the country. Unique among his peers, Russell assists clients on federal legislative, regulatory, and transactional matters. He analyzes legislation on behalf of clients, participates in proceedings before the FCC and other federal agencies, negotiates spectrum agreements, and represents wireless providers in spectrum auctions. He is also frequently consulted on matters involving US spectrum use and policy.

Whether they are in the middle of a...

Jonathan P. Garvin Communications & Media Attorney Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo Washington, DC

Jon focuses his practice on a wide range of legal challenges facing companies in the communications and media industries. He regularly advises clients on transactional, regulatory, and compliance issues before the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) involving wireless, broadband, broadcast, and cable matters. In addition, Jon advises broadcast and print media clients on FTC and state-specific advertising rules and advises broadcast companies on Television Spectrum Repack and FCC license requirements. 

Jon brings FCC experience and insight to his engagements with the firm’s...