July 10, 2020

Volume X, Number 192

July 10, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 09, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 08, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Texas Supreme Court Holds Permission Not Needed to Drill Through Mineral Estate to Reach Adjoining Tract

On May 19, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court delivered its opinion in the case of Lightning Oil Company v. Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, finding a lessee’s right in the mineral estate did not include the right to preclude a surface owner or an adjacent lessee’s activities that are not intended to capture the lessee’s minerals, but rather are intended only to traverse, or bore through, the formations in which the lessee’s minerals are located. 

Anadarko E&P Onshore, LLC, entered into an oil and gas agreement with the State of Texas restricting surface use and requiring drilling from off-site locations “when prudent and feasible.”  Thus, Anadarko entered into an Agreement to allow it to horizontally drill from an adjacent surface estate owned by Briscoe Ranch, Inc. to produce minerals from Anadarko’s lease (“Briscoe Agreement”).  The minerals underlying Briscoe’s surface estate were leased to Lightning Oil Co. (“Lightning”).  Lightning was not a party to the Briscoe Agreement and sought to enjoin Anadarko from drilling on the ranch.  Lightning brought suit for trespass and tortious interference claiming Anadarko needed its consent to drill through the ranch’s subsurface covered by Lightning’s mineral lease.  The district court dismissed the claim via summary judgment and the court of appeals affirmed.   

In examining mineral owner versus surface owner rights, the Court opined that “an unauthorized interference with the place where the minerals are located constitutes a trespass as to the mineral estate only if the interference infringes on the mineral lessee’s ability to exercise its right.” (p. 14).  Lightning’s mere speculation that Anadarko’s drilling activities would interfere with Lightning’s future right to develop its minerals was insufficient evidence of “imminent, irreparable harm” necessary for injunctive relief (Id.) Additionally, the Court opined that the accommodation doctrine applied to provide a “sound and workable basis for resolving conflict.” (p. 15).

Although it was undisputed that Anadarko would be interfering with a small amount of minerals owned by Lightning, the Court held that “the loss of minerals Lightning will suffer by a well being drilled through its mineral estate is not sufficient injury to support a claim for trespass.” (p. 17-18).  The Court further pointed out that off-lease drilling arrangements often provide the most efficient means of fully exploiting minerals through horizontal drilling.

The Court also dismissed the tortious interference with contract claim because Anadarko had the justifiable right to drill pursuant to the terms of the Briscoe Agreement; therefore, Anadarko’s exercise of its own contractual rights could not serve as the basis for a claim for tortious interference with Lightning’s mineral lease contract.

© Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 164


About this Author

Christina A. Denmark, Energy Attorney, Steptoe & Johnson Law Firm
Of Counsel

Christina Denmark focuses her practice in the areas of energy and mineral title law.  Ms. Denmark brings unique experience to her practice in the energy department, as she previously was a trial attorney who concentrated her practice on the defense of toxic tort and personal injury claims.  She handled litigation claims for individuals and companies, as well as acted as national coordinating counsel.

Jason Grill, Steptoe Johnson Law Firm, Personal Injury and Civil Procedure Litigation Attorney
Of Counsel

Jason's principal area of practice is civil litigation defense representing clients in matters involving personal injury and wrongful death, property damage, products liability, transportation, oil field accident liability, professional legal malpractice, insurance coverage matters, toxic tort liability (including silicosis claims), construction defects and premises liability. Jason has represented clients at both the trial and appellate stages in State and Federal Court. Jason's representative clients have included oil and gas drilling and service companies, oil and gas operators, trucking companies, product manufacturers and distributors, attorneys and law firms, doctors, insurance companies, various employers and companies, land developers and homeowners' associations.