June 5, 2020

June 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

U.K. Begins Phase II Probe of Cengage/McGraw-Hill Merger

Opposition mounts, putting deal at risk.

On March 10, 2020, the U.K.’s Competition and Markets Authority gave Cengage and McGraw-Hill an ultimatum – provide remedies that cure the competition problems caused by the merger or face a Phase II inquiry. Then, on March 24, 2020, the CMA rejected the merging parties’ proposed remedies and said it will proceed to a Phase II investigation. The CMA is required to complete the Phase II probe and issue a decision on the proposed merger by Sept. 7, 2020.

The CMA joins several other nations that have raised concerns about the merger, including Australia, New Zealand and the U.S.

Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission sent the merging parties a statement of issues in December 2019, concluding that the deal could lead to “higher prices, reduced quality or a more limited product range for students in Australia.”

New Zealand’s Commerce Commission sent the merging parties a similar statement of issues in February 2020.

And, although the Department of Justice has not publicly commented on the deal, U.S. lawmakers have publicly urged the DOJ to “closely scrutinize” the merger, explaining the merger could “increase the financial burden on American students, jeopardize their privacy, and unduly influence their education.”

Put simply, given this large (and growing) number of opponents, there is very little chance the merger closes in its current form.

Edited by Tom Hagy for MoginRubin LLP.

© MoginRubin LLP


About this Author

Timothy Z. LaComb Antitrust Lawyer Mogin Rubin Law Firm

Mr. LaComb is an Associate in MoginRubin LLP’s San Diego office and his practice focuses on antitrust, unfair competition, and complex business litigation, particularly as they relate to mergers and acquisitions. Prior to joining MoginRubin LLP, Mr. LaComb was an Associate at Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP where he helped secure several multi-million-dollar recoveries for shareholders in merger-related class action litigation.  Through his extensive experience in complex litigation, he has developed an expertise and proficiency in electronic and other discovery-related issues...