August 3, 2020

Volume X, Number 216

August 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

United States Supreme Court Validates Class and Collective Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

In a 5-4 decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, No. 16-285, the United States Supreme Court upheld the use of class and collective actions waivers in arbitration agreements.  Employers nationwide may require employees to sign agreements to arbitrate any employment disputes on an individual basis

The majority opinion, written by Justice Gorsuch, found no conflict between the broad mandate to enforce arbitration agreements under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) and employees’ rights to bargain collectively under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”).  Observing that these nearly 100-year-old laws “have long enjoyed separate spheres of influence,” the majority opinion saw no reason to pick one statute over the other.

The majority noted that the NLRA focuses on the right to organize unions and bargain collectively. While the NLRA permits unions to bargain to prohibit arbitration, it does not approve or disapprove of arbitration, mention class or collective action procedures (which did not exist when the NLRA was enacted), or “hint at a wish to displace the Arbitration Act.”  The majority’s enforcement of individualized arbitration agreements obeys the Supreme Court’s long-standing practice to harmonize statutes whenever possible.

The majority also rejected the suggestion that class and collective action waivers are invalidated by the savings clause of the FAA.  The savings clause voids arbitration agreements based upon contract defenses generally applicable to “any” contract, such as fraud or duress, not because an employer and employee freely contracted for individualized, as opposed to class, arbitration.  

The judicial approval of class and collective action waivers in arbitration agreements presents an opportunity to consider whether, and how best, to implement an arbitration program for employment disputes. 

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in CaliforniaNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 141


About this Author

Stan Hill, Polsinelli PC, Class Action Lawsuits Lawyer, Labor Discrimination Attorney, Atlanta,

Stan Hill is a strategic thinker, both inside and outside the litigation context, with an unwavering focus on achieving his clients' goals. Stan's passion for employment law began during his federal clerkship, and his practice today spans individual, collective, and class actions brought under state and federal employment laws, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fair Labor Standards Act and state wage-and-hour laws, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Family and Medical Leave Act.