May 23, 2022

Volume XII, Number 143

Advertisement
Advertisement

May 20, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

WV Fed. Court Requires Proof of Safer, Alternative Design for Strict Liability

The Federal Court for the Southern District of West Virginia recently held that plaintiffs in a multi-district litigation over surgical mesh would have to prove that a safer, alternative design to an allegedly defective product was feasible at the time of production, and that such design would have eliminated plaintiffs’ risk of injury. The Court based its holding on West Virginia’s pattern jury instructions, which were authored and adopted after “extensive research, editing, and committee review,” by West Virginia lawyers, judges, and the Supreme Court.

In accordance with prior West Virginia precedent, the Court held that “to prove that a design is defective, [plaintiffs] must prove that there was an alternative, feasible design,” which existed at the time of manufacture that would have “eliminated the risk that injured [them].” This is because “[t]here are many designs which, although they may eliminate a particular risk, are not practicable to produce.”

© Steptoe & Johnson PLLC. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 34
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Jim Mulhall, Litigation Attorney, Steptoe Johnson Law FIrm
Member

Jim Mulhall is the leader of the firm's Products Liability Practice Group and Toxic Torts Team.  Mr. Mulhall concentrates his practice in the areas of asbestos, product liability, toxic torts, and mass tort litigation.  He is the co-chair of the International Dispute Resolution Practice Group in TerraLex.

(304) 933-8164
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement