Civil Procedure

The National Law Review covers a broad range of cases, litigation, news, and stories, as they relate to civil procedure in the United States and internationally. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Criminal Rules of Civil Procedure, guide litigation at civil and criminal levels in the United States. Further, standard federal and state courts also have general rules of civil procedure which serve as guidelines of what the court expects, how parties should interact in proceedings, and how evidence should be presented in cases. The National Law Review provides in depth analysis of the rules of procedure, and how they possibly affect the outcome of different cases at the state and federal level.

When adjudicating civil lawsuits, parties must act accordingly, not only at trial, but also in the presentation of evidence, witness statements, and how they interact outside of court. All of this is guided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The National Law Review not only publishes updates to those rules as they are updated by the courts, but also covers topics including: issues of discovery, the complexities which e-discovery present today, use of expert testimony at trial, hearsay evidence, and other areas of trial/party interactions, which are governed by the Rules of Procedure.

The Civil Rules of Procedure also dictate the venue and jurisdiction which courts have to hear certain cases. The National Law Review covers topics including personal, subject-matter, and party jurisdiction, which dictate which courts parties can file a lawsuit it. Jurisdictional requirements further govern whether or not a case can be brought at the federal level, or first has to go through state courts. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure serve as guides in filing a civil or criminal lawsuit. Visitors to the National Law Review can find topics which cover constitutional issues, such as Article III (standing requirement), what judicial sanctions are imposed for violating the rules of procedure, how spoliation of evidence is dealt with, introducing digital evidence, and even introduction of social media evidence, as it is so highly used in today’s digital world.

The National Law Review covers cases, news, and stories which deal with the rules of procedure, litigation, and updates to the Federal Rules, which may impact parties to a lawsuit, and where they can bring a lawsuit based on those rules.

 

For hourly updates on the latest in legal, legislation, government regulation & compliance, litigation, court procedures, and corporate law news, be sure to follow the National Law Review Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

 

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Dec
24
2015
"Exclusive Ownership” Is Not Necessary for Standing in an IPR McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2022
"My Lawyer Made Me Do It" is Not an Absolute Defense to Bankruptcy Court Sanctions Ward and Smith, P.A.
Jul
14
2014
"Neither a Borrower Nor Lender Be" Was Only Half Right for Defense Attorneys Armstrong Teasdale
Mar
30
2013
"Robins Dry Dock" Rule Alive and Well Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
10
2011
"Supreme Court Decision Limits Use of “Stream of Commerce” Jurisdiction Theory to Subject Foreign Manufacturers to Suit in the U.S." - Litigation Alert Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
22
2020
$100 a Day in Sanctions: Shelton Is Simply Crushing a TCPA Defendant and I Just Can’t Watch Anymore Troutman Amin, LLP
Jul
7
2023
$228M Damages Award Vacated In Illinois Biometric Privacy Class Action ArentFox Schiff LLP
Aug
16
2016
$3 Million Spoliation Sanction Despite Company’s Litigation Hold Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
2
2011
$32 Million Damages Award Against Web Hosts Reduced by One-Third—Contributory Infringement Limited to Single Award of Statutory Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
20
2020
$4,000,000, Not Enough!: District Court Denies Final Approval for TCPA Class Settlement Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
2
2013
$6.6 Million in Sanctions Awarded to Defendants for an “Exceptional Case” Revoked Due to Admissions and Lack of Competing Evidence at Patent Trial McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
14
2022
$7.5 Million Jury Verdict for Employer in Unfair Competition and Restrictive Covenant Case Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
16
2016
$70M Verdict Makes Johnson & Johnson Seek A Friendlier Frye Venue IMS Legal Strategies
Apr
11
2012
'Round the Turn They're A-Comin'! The Wild Patent Enforcement Ride of Marine Polymer v. HemCon Bracewell LLP
Jun
17
2021
10th Circuit Falls into Line on Exceptionality Doctrine in Lanham Act Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
29
2013
11th Circuit Retains Jurisdiction in “Contract” Case, But Construes Patent Claims and Opines on Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
17
2020
11th Circuit Reverses Lower Court’s Decision to Dismiss Pro Se’s Third Amended TCPA Complaint, Holds Here That 4th Try’s a Charm Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
29
2012
11th Circuit Sua Sponte Vacates and Replaces Earlier Opinion in Lanham Act Case, but “Harmless Error” Doctrine Preserves Original Result Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
6
2014
1782 Discovery Applications Now Permitted in a ‘Reasonably Contemplated’ Foreign Judicial Proceeding McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
29
2021
1933 Act Cases: An Excerpt from Securities Class Action Filings—2021 Midyear Assessment Cornerstone Research
Aug
25
2015
1st Circuit weighs in on Rule 68 Mootness Issue; Laments that “Uncertainty will Reign” until Supreme Court provides Guidance on Class Action Pick-Offs Faegre Drinker
Feb
21
2014
2, 4, 6, 8…NFL Cheerleaders Not “Rah Rah-ing” About Pay Rate Mintz
Dec
22
2015
2015 Federal Rules Amendments: importance of proportionality Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
23
2015
2015 Promises to Bring Further Clarity to Whether Defendants Can Moot Class Actions by Mooting the Claims of Named Plaintiffs Faegre Drinker
Feb
15
2016
2016 Changes to Colorado Civil Procedure Rules Holland & Hart LLP
Dec
14
2017
2017 Removal Roundup: How Can Defendants Get Into Federal Court? ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
21
2021
2020 IP Law Year in Review: Trademarks McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
15
2020
2020 Post-Election Analysis Issue by Issue: Appropriations and Budget Bracewell LLP
Jan
7
2022
2022 Offers of Judgement: Being Proactive on Both Sides Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Aug
10
2015
21st Century Law Practice: Multi-Jurisdictional and Cross-Border Practice Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP
Jan
10
2022
22 Affirmative Defenses for 2022 Roetzel & Andress LPA
Apr
16
2020
26 Phone Calls, 22 Lawsuits, 22 Sets of Discovery—Turns Out Making a Defendant’s Life as Painful as Possible Violates the Claim Splitting Doctrine Troutman Amin, LLP
Oct
20
2020
28 U.S.C. Section 1782(a) – The Good Samaritan for Taking Evidence in the USA for Foreign Arbitrations – A Comparative Analysis Nishith Desai Associates
Nov
28
2013
2nd Circuit to Decide Unpaid Interns’ Class Status Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
21
2022
3 Pivotal Documents in A Corporate Whistleblower Retaliation Case Bachman Law
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins