Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Feb
17
2016
Patent Dispute Over Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Launched in Northern District of Georgia Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
29
2013
Patent Drafting Secrets – Techniques and Templates Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Jul
18
2016
Patent Due Diligence and Evaluation After America Invents Act Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
22
2016
Patent Due Diligence: All That Glitters May Not Be PTAB Gold! Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
2
2014
Patent Eligibility Challenges in Post-Grant Proceedings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
15
2013
Patent Eligibility of an Invention Implemented by Computers Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
19
2013
Patent Eligibility of Software Innovations After CLS Bank Mintz
Mar
3
2015
Patent Eligibility Under Alice: Reliance on Lack of Routine or Conventional Use Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
2
2016
Patent Eligibility: A Response to Rejections Under 35 USC §101 Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
15
2013
Patent Eligible Subject Matter: A Review of What Others Are Saying Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
25
2014
Patent Enforcement and Licensing Changes for Patent Owners [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
30
2019
Patent Enforcement Letters may Create Personal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
24
2014
Patent Enforcement Protected by First Amendment? McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
22
2018
Patent Exhaustion Defense Unavailable to Reseller after Impression Products Mintz
Dec
29
2010
Patent Exhaustion Doctrine in China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
31
2013
Patent Exhaustion for Self-Replicating Articles Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Nov
13
2015
Patent Exhaustion Means No Remedy for Refills IMS Legal Strategies
Jun
1
2013
Patent Exhaustion Rejected: Patented Seed Purchaser Has No Right to Make Copies McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
16
2011
Patent Exhaustion Still Applies when Licensees Fail to Pay Royalties McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
18
2021
Patent Extension Requires Board or Court Reversal, Multiple Examiner Actions Not Enough McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
7
2014
Patent Families Re: Patent Applications Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jan
3
2012
Patent Fast Lanes Now Open Despite Holiday Rush! Bracewell LLP
Feb
28
2013
Patent Filing Considerations Under the American Invents Act (AIA) on the Eve of March16th Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
9
2021
Patent for the Squatty Potty Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
16
2017
Patent Grace Period Laws in the IP5 Patent Offices: Some Similarities But Largely Different Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
16
2017
Patent Grace Periods and Public Disclosures: Finding Saving Grace (Period) to Minimize Impact of Pre-Filing Public Disclosures Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
10
2014
Patent Hold-Up or Patent Hold-Out? Judge Essex Adds His Voice to the SEP-FRAND Debate Mintz
Apr
18
2017
Patent Holder Sues CBS and iHeart Over Digital Audio Signal Transmission Systems Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jun
12
2011
Patent Holder Takes a Shot at Nintendo over DSi Cameras Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2016
Patent Infringement Claim Exempts Related Counterclaims from Mandatory Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
18
2018
Patent Infringement Claim Involving Complicated Technology May Require Additional Detail in Complaint Mintz
Dec
30
2012
Patent Infringement Claims Not Precluded by Related Trademark Infringement Claims in Prior Suit McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
18
2014
Patent Infringement Complaint Seeks To Fence Competitor Out Of Field Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Mar
31
2014
Patent Infringement Defense Leveraging Contested Proceedings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
29
2014
Patent Infringement Litigation: No Appellate Jurisdiction Over an Interlocutory Contempt Order McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins