Intellectual Property

Intellectual property disputes take place on a daily basis in a variety of venues. From an employee’s right to a patent of company-developed products to patent wars between international companies for illegal use of a product/logo, the National Law Review is a great resource for updates on all things IP. The site covers litigation at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the  Patent Trial and Board Appeals (PTAB), as well as cases in front of the International Trade Commission (ITC) for international patent disputes. The National Law Review covers cases heard by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), or appeals which are now sitting in front of the patent-board on Inter partes review (IPR). Additionally, the National Law Review covers cases and decisions of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

Copyrights, patent infringement claims, trade secrets, false advertising claims, unfair competition, and intellectual property laws which govern patent-litigation, are all areas which the National Law Review covers, in detail for readers. Patent disputes don’t only occur in the United States. When international countries including the United Kingdom, Brazil, China, India, and the European Union get involved, international laws are also taken into consideration by the PTO. Additionally, information on how to obtain patent protection internationally is also available on the National Law Review.

Intellectual property news on the National Law Review spans from topics including biosimilars, domain name registration, generic top-level domains (gTLDs), drug patents, non-compete agreements, trade secrets, and other industry-related battles which ensue, are covered on the site. Visitors can read about the latest legislation, laws, and news, as it relates to patents and intellectual property in general. Further, visitors to the National Law Review are going to find the latest stories and litigation as it unfolds in front of patent courts across the land. From email and data retention policies, patent disputes over medical devices, cloud computing and artificial intelligence the National Law Review has the details and expert intellectual property litigation legal analysis readers count on.

For hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Aug
26
2021
The Application of “Authentication by Comparison” at the PTAB McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
15
2013
The Architecture of Copyright Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
26
2020
The Art of An SEP War: A Chinese IP Court’s Recent Use of Anti-Suit Injunction Invites A Battle that It Likely Won’t Win Mintz
Dec
7
2023
The Art of Teaching Complex Technology in Patent Litigation – Episode 67 [Podcast] IMS Legal Strategies
Nov
28
2016
The Australian Patent Office Once Again Allows Claims Directed to Nucleic Acids K&L Gates
Apr
28
2020
The Availability of Section 1782 Discovery in International Commercial Arbitration: A View from Northern California and the Epicenter of IP Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
5
2020
The Balance Between Obviousness and Written Description — Lessons Learned from Recent Decisions Katten
Dec
20
2023
The Barbie Movie: The Power of Brand Placement and Partnerships Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
8
2012
The Batching Games: ICANN’s Plan to Process New gTLD Applications Mintz
Jan
8
2024
The Battle of the Bulls: NBA Fail to Invalidate Pizza Texas Bulls Trade Mark Similar to the Chicago Bulls Logo in the United Kingdom K&L Gates
Dec
23
2022
THE BATTLE OF THE SUPERMARKETS VOL. 2 – Gingle Bells, Gingle Bells, Gin All the Way K&L Gates
Dec
9
2022
The Battle of The Supermarkets – Evergreening of Trade Marks and Potential Bad Faith K&L Gates
Sep
24
2021
The Battle over BLACK IRISH Liqueur Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jun
22
2023
The Best Option Is Obviously Not the Only Option McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
11
2016
The Biggest Technology Give-Away in History? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
2
2014
The Bill Graham Show Goes On … and On: Graham-Sult v. Clainos McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
14
2020
The Bio/Pharma Beat July 2020 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
29
2023
The BioPharma Patent Cliff: 2023 and Beyond Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
13
2015
The Blurred Line Between Inspiration and Copying - A $7.4 Million Copyright Question Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
18
2017
The Board Gives Section 325(d) Sharp Teeth Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
15
2017
The Board Gives Section 325(d) Sharp Teeth—Part II – The Petitioner's Criticality to Selecting and Using The Right Prior Art Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
22
2017
The Board Gives Section 325(d) Sharp Teeth—Part III —Things Are Looking Up for Patent Owners Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
29
2022
The Board Is Back in Town: Arthrex Can’t Save Untimely Motions to Terminate McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
6
2014
The Brazilian Patent Office Places the Fight against the Patent Application Backlog as its Top Priority Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
8
2014
The Breadth of India’s “Bolar Exemption” Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
31
2015
The Brinkmann Corporation v. A&J Manufacturing: Decision on Institution IPR2015-00056 Faegre Drinker
Aug
20
2018
The CAFC Rules for Wider Application of Litigation Time Bar Against Filing of Inter Partes Reviews Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
15
2017
The CAFC Vacated the Northern District of California’s Claim Construction Because the District Court Improperly Limited the Claims Based on Prosecution History Disclaimer Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
12
2018
The Carvedilol District Court Case: More May Be Needed to Prove Inducement from a Generic Product Label in the Context of an “At-Risk” Launch Brinks Gilson & Lione
Apr
2
2021
The CASE Act: A Small Claims Court for Copyright Infringement Norris McLaughlin P.A.
May
7
2014
The Case of Ophthalmic Drugs in Italy and France: A Lesson to Learn - Parallel Antitrust Investigations and Cooperation Between National Competition Authorities McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2021
The Case of the [Allegedly] Stolen & Finnegan
Sep
22
2021
The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China and the State Council issued the “Guidelines for Building a Powerful Country with Intellectual Property Rights (2021-2035)” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
27
2019
The Challenges of Patenting Autonomous Vehicle AI and Software Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
8
2017
The Cheerios Challenge of Registering Color Marks McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
11
2020
The China National Intellectual Property Administration Aims to Speed Up Patent Prosecution Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
8
2020
The China National Intellectual Property Administration Announces Top 10 Patent Invalidation Cases of 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
16
2020
The China National Intellectual Property Administration Releases Guiding Cases for Administrative Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
15
2021
The China Pivot: Closing the “Back Door” to Trade Secret and IP Theft Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
5
2018
The China Rules of Evidence Series – Online Purchase of Infringing Products and Forum Shopping in Trademark Infringement Cases Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
22
2020
The Chinese Supreme People’s Court Intervenes on Patent Issues, with Focus on Pharmaceutical Experiments Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
21
2019
The Claridge's Affair: A Win, but at What Cost? K&L Gates
Feb
6
2024
The Cloudy World of Look-A-Like Products - Aldi Successfully Defends Allegations of Trade Mark Infringement K&L Gates
Apr
13
2020
The Cold Hard Fact of Arctic Cat: Actual Notice is Necessary to Protect a Damages Claim from the Cold After Unmarked Patented Goods are Sold Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
1
2015
The Complications of Copyrighted Images in the Yellow Pages McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
6
2014
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
10
2014
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: A Further Update Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
4
2014
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: An Update Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
23
2014
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: To Stay or Not to Stay is the Question Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
22
2015
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: U.S. Supreme Court Decision Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins