August 1, 2021

Volume XI, Number 213

Advertisement

July 30, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 29, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Congress Permits SBA to Make PPP Loans to Debtors in Bankruptcy, SBA Says "No"

In June and December of 2020, we reported that the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits had held that the Small Business Administration ("SBA") may exclude debtors in bankruptcy from consideration for Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") loans, albeit for differing reasons. The recent Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 ("CAA"), signed into law on December 27, 2020, could have changed that. It contains provisions that provide some debtors with access to the program, but with a catch: these provisions do not take effect until the SBA provides its blessing in writing. The SBA has not provided its written blessing. Rather, it has expressly stated in its Interim Final Rule regarding the Business Loan Program Temporary Changes; Paycheck Protection Program as Amended by Economic Aid Act that debtors in bankruptcy do not qualify for PPP loans. IFR, Section B.2(c) (pages 26-27). The additional PPP lending under CAA will expire on March 31

The PPP was a central component of the CARES Act. Through August of 2020, the PPP allowed eligible small businesses to obtain guaranteed loans to pay certain expenses, such as payroll costs, rent, and utilities. Although the CARES Act did not discuss whether companies who have filed for bankruptcy protection are eligible to participate in the PPP, the SBA took the position that they are not. A number of bankrupt debtors sued the SBA over this bankruptcy exclusion. Although a few were successful, both Appellate Courts that have weighed in on the issue have determined that the SBA can properly exclude debtors from the PPP program.

The CAA contains provisions that could change that. These provisions would allow certain debtors in bankruptcy to apply for PPP loans. If not forgiven, a PPP loan would be treated as priority debt in the debtor's bankruptcy case—coming after secured debt in priority, but ahead of all non-priority unsecured debt. Debtors would be allowed to provide in their plans that their PPP loan is to be repaid in full under the loan's terms, which represents a slight change to how priority unsecured debt is normally treated in bankruptcy. Finally, the CAA provides that a bankruptcy court must hold a hearing within a week of a debtor's request for permission to incur a PPP loan.

The catch? The CAA does not overrule the SBA. These provisions do not take effect until the SBA submits a written determination to the Office of the United States Trustee (a.k.a., the government's watchdog in bankruptcy), stating that debtors are eligible to participate in the PPP program if they otherwise meet the eligibility requirements. Even then, not all business debtors would qualify – only businesses filing under the Small Business Reorganization Act of chapter 11 or under chapters 12 (farmers) or 13 (self-employed) would be eligible. Ordinary chapter 11 debtors need not apply.

What does this mean for lenders?

For now, the SBA's position—that bankrupt debtors are excluded from consideration for PPP loans—stands. Rather than undermine the SBA, the CAA appears to bolster the Appellate Court holdings, as it provides the SBA with the power to determine debtor eligibility for PPP loans. But, under the CAA, the SBA could change its position simply by issuing a letter to the Office of the United States Trustee. Thus, lenders should remain vigilant and monitor the SBA closely for further developments–even though it is unlikely that the SBA will do so, given the most recent IFR.

What does this mean for debtors?

Under the most recent IFR and the most recent PPP application, the existence of a currently pending bankruptcy makes a debtor ineligible for a PPP loan. Given the language in the CAA Act, it is highly unlikely that a bankruptcy court will order that a PPP loan under the CAA (either under the new round of PPP loans or as a second PPP loan) must be made. Debtors should avoid trying to "game" the system, as the SBA is vigilantly pursuing debtors who have done so, with over 65 criminal investigations currently pending.

© 2021 Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone PLC National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 15
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Ronald Spinner Bankruptcy Lawyer Miller Canfield
Principal

Ron Spinner brings extensive business experience to his bankruptcy practice, developing results-oriented strategies and breaking new legal ground where necessary to do so.

Indeed, Ron's ability to deal with novel situations helped tremendously in the City of Detroit bankruptcy case, where questions of first impression arose regularly. His ability to navigate the unique aspects of chapter 9 aided (and continues to aid) the City in its recovery.

As another example, Ron represented a creditor who "factored" the debtors' invoices. Courts typically characterize factoring as a "...

313.496.7829
Thomas Appleman Foreign Investment Lawyer Miller Canfield Law Firm
Principal

Thomas G. Appleman focuses his practice on inbound and outbound foreign direct investment and multi-national cross-border mergers, acquisitions and joint venture transactions.

He also helps U.S. clients take their products and services into the global marketplace by expanding their operations into Europe, China, India, Mexico, Brazil, South Korea and countries with emerging markets including Pakistan and Slovakia, and represents foreign businesses in establishing operations and joint ventures in North America.

With his colleagues, Tom helps clients...

248.267.3241
Steven A. Roach Litigation Attorney Miller Canfield
Principal

Steven A. Roach brings more than 30 years of commercial transaction and litigation experience in restructuring lending relationships and enforcing loan transactions. He applies this experience to provide a unique perspective as both a trial and transactional lawyer when representing and counselling the firm's financial institution clients. 

Steve has represented lenders in a variety of lending structures, including syndications, financing leases, structured debt and equity financings, multi-jurisdictional and international transactions. He has...

313.496.7933
Advertisement
Advertisement