July 9, 2020

Volume X, Number 191

July 09, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 08, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 06, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Cornerstone To An International Intellectual Property Protection Center

On January 11, 2018, the newly established Shenzhen intellectual property court issued a decision in a dispute between Huawei and Samsung involving standard essential patents in the wireless communication field.  This was the first case in China of its kind.  The court stated: “The launching of the Shenzhen intellectual property court demonstrated the dedication of the Shenzhen judicial system to assist the technology innovation of Shenzhen enterprises, the strategic position and function of Shenzhen.”   

Thanks to its booming hi-tech sector, Shenzhen recorded a nominal output of 2.24 trillion Chinese Yuan (US$338 billion) GDP in 2017, surpassing cities like Guangzhou, Hong Kong, Seoul, Osaka and Singapore according to the Shenzhen Special Zone Daily report published on January 15, 2018.  Accompanying such growth, there have been dramatic increases in both patent filings and IP litigation.  In 2016, Shenzhen had more than 140,000 China patent applications, 10 times the national average and close to 20,000 PCT filings, which accounted for more than half of all the PCT filings by Chinese companies.  Shenzhen courts handled 14,887 IP cases in 2016, half of Guangdong Province and one tenth of all cases in China.  Given this volume, we can expect the Shenzhen IP court to be at the forefront of efforts to provide IP protection for developing technologies and both international and domestic hi-tech companies.

As part of the Qianhai court system, the Shenzhen IP court will most likely adopt the Mainland-Hong Kong expert jury system, under which 13 Chinese and/or Hong Kong residents are selected as a jury to participate in the decision of a litigation.  The Shenzhen IP court will also implement a party-in-suit and attorney service system instead of a traditional court service system where a party-in-suit or its representative is allowed to serve the opponent.  In addition, the Shenzhen IP court is permitted to apply Hong Kong and other foreign laws in deciding cases in according to Shenzhen Qianhai Cooperative District People’s Court Service and Free Trade Zone Development Guidance White Paperpublished in August 2017.

In addition to the IP court, the Shenzhen Intellectual Property protection Center opened for business on August 8, 2017.  This center functions as a consolidated intellectual property service hub to hi-tech companies nearby.  “Together with the Shenzhen IP court, the South China Hi-Tech IP arbitration center, two IP forensic institutions and top intellectual property service providers and law firms, the IP protection center has laid the ground work for the intellectual property protection in Shenzhen,” said Mr. Fu Tian, deputy chairman of the Shenzhen municipal committee, during the IP center opening ceremony, “There is plenty of room for improvement in IP mediation, arbitration, litigation, administrative protection, efficient IP right verification and enforcement, monetization and operation.  In addition to China’s Silicon Valley, we dedicate ourselves to make Shenzhen an international IP protection center by the year of 2020.”

© 2020 Brinks Gilson Lione. All Rights Reserved. National Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 81


About this Author

Fei Hu Intellectual Property Lawyer Brinks

With significant intellectual property experience in leading technology companies, Fei Hu has an inside view of the vision and demands of the Internet, semiconductor and telecommunication industries.  Fei offers tailored intellectual property services that promote clients’ international interests. 

Fei’s extensive in-house experience in multinational high-tech companies enables him to have an in-depth understanding of clients’ industries and share their business missions.  He leverages his scientific background, legal knowledge and commercial...

Harold Johnson Infringement Lawyer Brinks

With more than three decades of experience to his credit, Harry Johnson brings an unequalled perspective to client counseling and litigation. Whether he is providing authoritative opinions on infringement, validity and freedom to operate, or leading business-critical patent, trade secret and unfair competition cases, Harry helps clients enforce intellectual property rights without losing sight of business goals.