October 22, 2021

Volume XI, Number 295

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 21, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 20, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 19, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

D.C.’s Displaced Workers Protection Act Expanded to Assist Employees Laid Off in COVID-19 Era

Eligible workers in D.C. who have been displaced by the COVID-19 pandemic have the opportunity to be reinstated once their employer starts rehiring after the pandemic, according to a new law. The “Displaced Workers Right to Reinstatement and Retention Amendment Act of 2020” also allows eligible employees to be reinstated and retained if there is a change in the ownership, controlling interest, or identity of their employer. The law is in effect until June 30, 2023.

D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser has announced that fully vaccinated individuals will no longer be required to wear masks in most situations, following new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations. Given the rapid loosening of COVID-19-related restrictions, many D.C. businesses are ramping up hiring as they hope to return to pre-COVID-19 business levels.

Covered Employers

The new law is designed to protect employees who work for certain employers or contractors, primarily in the retail, healthcare, security, and hospitality industries. Covered employers include operators of hotels, restaurants, taverns, brew pubs, nightclubs, entertainment venues, and businesses engaged in the sale of goods to consumers, but not wholesalers.

The Act applies to employers that had at least 50 employees as of March 1, 2020 (for hotels, at least 50 employees as of December 1, 2019). The law also applies to “contractors,” which means an individual or company, other than an employer, that employs at least 25 individuals and has hired individuals to work in food service, as janitorial or building maintenance workers, as nonprofessional employees in healthcare settings, or to perform security services, with some exceptions.

The law does not specify whether an employer or contractor should count only employees working in D.C., or all employees, when determining whether it is covered by the new law.

Covered Employees

Employees are protected if they worked at a covered establishment or for a covered contractor and stopped working for reasons other than voluntary resignation or termination for cause during certain specified time periods (described below). The law does not extend protection to employees who were employed in an executive, administrative, or professional capacity; those who received severance at separation; or those who could have been terminated for “demonstrable just cause” during their prior period of employment. The Act does not define this term.

If the employee worked for a hotel, the individual’s last date of employment had to be between December 1, 2019, and the last day of the public health emergency declared by Mayor’s Order in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, which is still in effect.

For all other eligible employees, the last date of employment had to be between March 1, 2020, and the last day of the public health emergency.

Employer Obligations

To comply with the new law, as positions become available, covered employers and contractors must:

  1. Offer each eligible employee reinstatement to the employee’s previous position or to a position performing the same or substantially similar duties;

  2. Communicate all offers in writing through email, text, or registered mail or other method that is documented and retained and provide three days for the employee to respond (if made by email or text) or seven days for the employee to respond (if made by registered mail or similar delivery method); and

  3. Return the reinstated employee to work seven days after the offer is accepted, unless the employer allows a later date.

Covered employers who change their identity, or experience a change in controlling interest but maintain the same or similar business operations, must first give notice of the anticipated change to all affected employees at least 15 days prior to the date the change is to take effect. The new employing entity must follow the procedures above to reinstate employees and must retain the reinstated employees for at least 90 days, absent a termination for cause. At the end of the 90-day transition period, the new employing entity must perform a written performance evaluation. If the employee’s performance is satisfactory, the new employing entity must offer the employee continued employment.

Anti-Retaliation; Private Right of Action

The law contains an anti-retaliation provision that prohibits covered employers from taking any adverse action against individuals who assert rights under, participate in proceedings related to, or oppose a practice believed to be in violation of, the law. Significantly, the Act creates a rebuttable presumption that an adverse action was retaliatory if it occurs within 60 days after the individual engaged in protected activity. To overcome this presumption, the employer must produce credible evidence that the sole reason for the adverse action was a legitimate business reason. The burden would then shift to the employee to show pretext.

The Act gives an aggrieved worker a private right of action to sue for back pay, the cost of lost benefits, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs. If the employer is found to have violated the law with malice or reckless indifference, the employee may be awarded treble damages, compensatory damages and punitive damages.

These provisions of the law expire June 30, 2024.

Implications

The new law can have broad-reaching consequences for employers with D.C.-based employees who are covered. Employers who terminated or laid off employees in the covered industries should review the new law and ensure they are offering reinstatement when required to do so. If reinstatement is not offered to previously employed incumbents, employers should be prepared to show cause, based on legitimate business reasons and with solid documentation. Employers also should be mindful when considering new corporate transactions involving D.C. establishments.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2021National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 155
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Matthew F. Nieman, Jackson Lewis, employment discrimination lawyer, tort contract claims attorney
Principal and Office Litigation Manager

Matthew F. Nieman is a Principal in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He also serves as the Litigation Manager for the office.

Mr. Nieman represents employers in a broad spectrum of labor and employment law matters, including discrimination, retaliation, wage and hour, whistleblower claims (including Dodd-Frank, the False Claims Act, and Sarbanes-Oxley), questions related to the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act of 1994 (“USERRA”), and workplace drug-testing issues. He is ...

703-483-8331
Teresa Burke Wright, Jackson Lewis, contracts litigation lawyer, administrative proceedings attorney
Principal

Teresa Wright is a Principal in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C. She represents numerous employers in both litigation and administrative proceedings and advises clients with respect to state and federal employment laws.

Ms. Wright has handled jury trials and other litigation involving discrimination, harassment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Family and Medical Leave Act and wrongful termination. She also counsels management regarding employment issues,...

703-483-8310
Janea J. Hawkins Employment Litigation Attorney Jackson Lewis Washington, D.C.
Associate

Janea J. Hawkins is an Associate in the Washington, D.C. Region office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Ms. Hawkins has a blend of government and private practice experience representing government agencies and private employers in a wide array of employment litigation. 

Ms. Hawkins regularly defends management in federal and state court; administrative claims of harassment; retaliation and discrimination claims on the basis of age, race, sex, and disability; wrongful discharge and breach of contract issues; and covenant not to compete disputes. She has also represented...

703-483-8300
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement