December 1, 2021

Volume XI, Number 335

Advertisement
Advertisement

December 01, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 30, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 29, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

EEOC Locks onto Bostock: New Guidance on Sexual Orientation and Other Gender Issues

You may recall our blog post last summer recapping the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia that held discrimination based on sexual orientation is prohibited by Title VII.  After that decision, we encouraged each of you to update your EEO and harassment policies, update your application forms and websites, train your supervisors and managers, and consider whether to prepare a policy or guidelines for transgender employees who are or will be transitioning.

Now the EEOC — or more specifically the EEOC’s Chair Charlotte Burrows — has published guidance on what may constitute discrimination based on sexual orientation and/or gender identity. There is drama around whether Burrows sought the approval of the other members of the EEOC before issuing the guidance, whether the guidance exceeds the scope of Bostock, and whether the guidance violates employers’ and employees’ religious and speech protections. We will monitor any updates around the issues and let you if anything changes, but as of now we assume that this is the EEOC’s stance on the issues.

The Guidance

The EEOC’s technical assistance document recaps the Bostock decision and provides, in Q&A format, guidance on several issues. Here’s a summary of the guidance:

  • Customer preferences do not trump an employee’s rights. Employers are not allowed to segregate or discriminate against employees based on actual or perceived customer preferences as to sexual orientation or gender identity (or other protected classes).

  • Dress codes are fine, but you must allow a transgender person to dress consistent with his or her identity. Employers may not discriminate against employees based on non-conformity with sex-based stereotypes.

  • Use an employee’s preferred name. Accidental and occasional mistakes are one thing, but severe or pervasive misuse of a transgender employee’s preferred name and pronouns could violate Title VII.

  • Separate, sex-segregated bathrooms and locker rooms are OK, but employers may not preclude transgender men from using the men’s facilities and transgender women from using the women’s facilities. For other materials regarding the bathroom issue and government recommendations regarding transgender employees, see the EEOC’s fact sheetOSHA’s guide, and the S. Office of Personnel Management’s guide.

The EEOC’s guidance further suggests that whether or not employers know their employee’s sexual orientation or gender identity may be no defense for discrimination. To find the entire technical assistance document, click here.

What Does This Mean?

Like we said last year, update your policies, train your supervisors and managers, consider whether to add a policy for transgender employees who are or will be transitioning, and consider whether unisex bathrooms and locker rooms make more sense for your company. Whatever you do, remember to be sensitive to your employees and reach out to your employment attorneys with the questions that we all know will come up. Together, we can figure out the best next steps for your business.

Print:

© 2021 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 201
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Cortlin Bond Healthcare Litigation Lawyer Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Associate

Cortlin Bond is an associate in the Litigation Practice Group. She represents clients in a variety of general litigation matters and assists healthcare providers with legal issues that arise from the daily operation of healthcare facilities. In addition to handling healthcare and general litigation matters, Cortlin assists employers with a variety of labor and employment matters, including workplace investigations, the defense of federal employment claims, and the defense of employment claims predicated on state law tort and contract theories.

Prior to law school, Cortlin worked at...

205.521.8206
Anne R. Yuengert Employment Attorney Bradley Birmingham
Partner

Anne Yuengert works with clients to manage their employees, including conducting workplace investigations of harassment or theft, training employees and supervisors, consulting on reductions in force and severance agreements, drafting employment agreements (including enforceable noncompetes) and handbooks, assessing reasonable accommodations for disabilities, and working through issues surrounding FMLA and USERRA leave. When preventive measures are not enough, she handles EEOC charges, OFCCP and DOL complaints and investigations, and has handled cases before arbitrators...

205-521-8362
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement