June 15, 2019

June 14, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 13, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 12, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

EEOC Receives Record Number of Charges of Discrimination for the Second Year in a Row

According to a U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) press release, the EEOC received a record number of private sector charges of employment discrimination in fiscal year 2011.  This marks the second year in a row that charges of discrimination filed with the EEOC hit an all-time high.

The EEOC received a total of 99,947 charges of discrimination in fiscal year 2011, a slight increase from the year before.  Like in fiscal year 2010, charges alleging retaliation were the most numerous, representing 37.4 percent of all charges filed.  Charges of race discrimination followed, with 35,395 charges representing 35.4 percent of the total charges filed.

In fiscal year 2011, the EEOC filed 300 lawsuits and 261 “merits” lawsuits, which include direct suits and interventions alleging violations of the substantive provisions of the statutes enforced by the EEOC and suits to enforce administrative settlements.

As these statistics demonstrate, adverse actions taken by employers, such as terminations, demotions, pay decreases, and certain transfers, are increasingly likely to result in a charge of discrimination or litigation.  More and more often, those charges and lawsuits are based on claims of retaliation.  Under the laws enforced by the EEOC, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, an employer may not retaliate against an employee because he or she engaged in protected activity under these statutes.  Protected activity could include filing a charge of discrimination with the EEOC, making a good faith complaint to an employer about discrimination on the job, or participating in an employment discrimination proceeding (such as an investigation or lawsuit).  Employers should therefore be aware that they are exposed to a heightened risk of litigation if adverse action is taken against an employee who has previously complained about alleged discrimination or other alleged unlawful employment practices.

To help defend against the increasing claims of discrimination and retaliation, employers are encouraged to review their anti-discrimination policies with managers and staff, ensure that there is an appropriate reporting procedure for complaints, and train managers to properly respond to complaints of discrimination.  Just as important, an employer should carefully analyze the reasons and facts surrounding any adverse action it plans to take against an employee to ensure that it can articulate and prove the legitimate lawful business reasons for the action.

The fiscal year 2011 enforcement and litigation statistics are available on the EEOC’s website at http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/index.cfm.

© 2019 Poyner Spruill LLP. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Danielle Barbour Wilson, Litigation Attorney, Poyner Spruill Law Firm
Associate

Danielle’s practice is focused in the areas of Litigation and Employment Law. She represents private and public employers in a wide range of labor and employment matters. Danielle has assisted in defending putative class actions before federal district and appellate courts and defended claims against local government entities. She also advises clients regarding data protection and privacy issues.

Representative Experience

  • Defends employers in a wide range of employment litigation in both state and federal courts

  • ...
919-783-2982
David L. Woodard, Employment Litigation Attorney, Poyner Spruill, Law firm
Partner

David practices in the area of employment litigation.  He regularly advises and defends clients in race, age, disability and sex discrimination and harassment cases; reviews handbooks and termination issues; and provides compliance advice on matters of employment law.

Representative Experience

McNeil v. Scotland County - Obtained summary judgment for employer where plaintiff alleged race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act as well as violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Successfully defended the judgment in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Williams v. City of Fayetteville - Obtained summary judgment on former employee’s claims of retaliation for exercising First Amendment rights, violations of due process, and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
919-783-2854