October 25, 2020

Volume X, Number 299

Advertisement

October 23, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

ESG-Focused Fund Strategies Face SEC Scrutiny on Disclosures and Internal Procedures

As investors drive demand for investment products focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors, fund managers have increasingly offered ESG-focused or “sustainable investing” funds. However, a recent speech by SEC Commissioner Elad Roisman has highlighted regulatory concerns for fund managers in the ESG space, particularly with respect to disclosures and internal compliance.

Commissioner Roisman’s speech raised two particular issues: When a fund manager claims that green or sustainability metrics are driving their metrics, how are these metrics measured? And is the manager fully disclosing whether an ESG focus improves or perhaps is a trade-off limiting returns?

Earlier this year, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) identified ESG investment strategies as a stated focus area in its 2020 Exam Priorities. These priorities publicly stated that OCIE would examine the accuracy and adequacy of disclosures for new or emerging investment strategies, in particular those that incorporate ESG criteria.

How has the SEC exam staff been monitoring the space? In recent years OCIE has sent a number of ESG-focused fund managers detailed document requests relating to ESG strategies. Our sense is that OCIE has been gathering information on practices in ESG investing across the industry. The OCIE document requests seek information in five general categories:

  1. What kind of scoring and benchmarks are being used, particularly whether the firm uses a third-party system or a proprietary one, and applicable written procedures.
  2. Lists of particular ESG investments made or recommended, and the ESG scoring for each.
  3. Internal processes and policies, including compliance evaluations or internal audits related to ESG investments and information on applicable service providers.
  4. Returns on ESG investments (e.g., most and least profitable investments, as well as financial performance metrics and non-financial ESG performance metrics).
  5. All marketing materials that describe the ESG program to current or prospective investors.

OCIE’s requests have been fairly detailed, but the particular focus appears to be on whether disclosures adequately reflect the firm’s practices, and whether there are sufficient internal procedures in place to monitor and measure ESG-related investments in light of those disclosures. For registered investment advisers, these inquiries reflect the SEC’s regulatory mandate. First, under Section 206 of the Advisers Act, the general antifraud provisions prohibit fraudulent or deceptive conduct, in light of advisers’ fiduciary obligations to clients. Second, the Compliance Rule (Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7) requires SEC-registered advisers to implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations of the securities laws.

The SEC’s focus is also reflected in Commissioner Roisman’s recent speech, asserting his personal view that the ESG space was one where more disclosure from asset managers could be warranted. He noted that more managers are asserting that ESG metrics are driving their decisions, but that there are no universal definitions for “green” or “sustainable” funds, and strategies can differ across the ESG spectrum. Furthermore, there are questions about “greenwashing”, or using labeling as a marketing tool without adequate process or taking credit for more of an environmental impact than is warranted. In sum, Roisman asserted that fund managers should explain to investors what “E” “S” or “G” mean in the context of their fund strategies and how they are taken into account.

Looking outward, there has been significant momentum in the area of ESG disclosure in other jurisdictions, which the SEC may take into account as it further engages on these issues. The European Union, for example, has developed a comprehensive “Taxonomy Regulation” and “Disclosure Regulation” which will start to apply from March 2021, and which promotes clearer transparency between investors and managers on ESG metrics. The rules also provide a harmonized taxonomy to clarify what should be considered “green” or “sustainable” to avoid managers’ greenwashing products.

As the SEC continues to focus on this space, definitions used by managers, managers’ internal process to analyze ESG investments and the corresponding disclosures to investors will be of particular concern.

© 2020 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume X, Number 238
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Joshua Newville, Proskauer Rose, regulatory enforcement attorney, industry compliance legal counsel, securities exchange commission lawyer
Partner

Joshua M. Newville is a partner in the Litigation Department in New York. His practice focuses on commercial litigation and regulatory investigations. Mr. Newville advises companies and individuals in securities litigation and compliance matters. He also focuses on internal investigations and enforcement matters. Prior to joining Proskauer, Josh was senior counsel in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement, where he investigated and prosecuted violations of the federal securities laws. Josh served in the Enforcement Division’s Asset...

212-969-3336
Kirsten Lapham FInancial Services Attorney Proskauer Rose Law Firm, United Kingdom
Partner

Kirsten Lapham is a partner specialising in financial services regulation. She advises a broad range of both institutional and individual clients on a variety of financial services regulatory and compliance issues. Her practice has a specific emphasis on the regulatory issues arising under the AIFMD, and MiFID II for a range of EU and indirectly impacted firms outside of the EU.

Experience in this area includes advising multiple clients on the EU marketing and registration regimes and overlaying local regulatory considerations, such as the U.K. retail distribution review and Financial Promotion regime. Kirsten has also worked on MIFID II implementation projects and provided ongoing support for well-known asset managers and advised multiple clients on re-papering arrangements under the Directive. Kirsten also routinely advises on the regulatory issues that impact M&A transactions. She has represented some of the largest and most well-known alternative investment managers, including: TPG; PIMCO; Citi Private Bank; Dragoneer Investment Group; and a number of US and UK boutiques among many others.

+44.20.7280.2031
Advertisement
Advertisement