December 2, 2022

Volume XII, Number 336

Advertisement

December 01, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 30, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

November 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Fifth Circuit Stays OSHA’s Vaccine or Testing Emergency Temporary Standard – What’s Next?

On November 5, 2021, OSHA released an Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”)  requiring large employers—those with 100 or more employees—to implement a vaccination policy mandating that their employees either be vaccinated or submit to weekly testing. The ETS gave employers until December 5, 2021 to comply with the bulk of the ETS’s requirements, and until January 4, 2022 to begin testing employees who have not yet been fully vaccinated. Several legal challenges ensued.

The Fifth Circuit’s Order

On November 12, 2021, just one week after OSHA released its ETS, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an order staying enforcement and implementation of the ETS pending further judicial review. Reviewing the ETS, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the COVID-19 virus is not the sort of “substance” or “agent” that poses such a “grave danger” as to allow OSHA to take emergency action. The Fifth Circuit further criticized the scope of the ETS, characterizing it as a “one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers) that have more than a little bearing on workers’ varying degrees of susceptibility” to the virus. Thus, the Fifth Circuit concluded that the ETS’s challengers are likely to succeed on the merits, and therefore issued a stay requiring OSHA to suspend activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the ETS pending future developments in the litigation.

Next Steps for the ETS: “The Lottery”

Though the Fifth Circuit was the first to issue a decision addressing the ETS, it is not the only Circuit where appeals are pending. Challenges to the ETS are making their way through virtually every circuit court of appeals, including the Second Circuit. Given the large number of similar appeals, they will be consolidated and assigned to a single circuit court using a lottery system orchestrated by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Notably, the Circuit that ultimately hears the challenge will have the power to modify or nullify the stay issued by the Fifth Circuit. In other words, the Fifth Circuit’s stay may or may not be short-lived.

Practical Implications for Employers

It is important to note that the Fifth Circuit’s stay does not mean, or even suggest, that employer-instituted vaccine mandates are themselves unlawful. To the contrary, the EEOC has already taken the position that, so long as they allow for reasonable accommodations consistent with Title VII and the ADA, such policies do not violate federal law. Accordingly, while the Fifth Circuit has prohibited OSHA from implementing and enforcing the ETS until further notice, and OSHA has announced it will comply with the Fifth Circuit’s mandate, employers remain free to institute compliant vaccine or testing policies of their own choosing. Moreover, for federal contractors, vaccine mandates are still required – all employees must be fully vaccinated by January 18, 2022 pursuant to President Biden’s Executive Order and its implementing guidance.

For now, employers should stay tuned for updates, as the status of the ETS is subject change rapidly. Given the rapid pace of developments, employers would be wise to continue preparations to comply with the ETS in the event it survives ongoing judicial scrutiny. 

© 1998-2022 Wiggin and Dana LLPNational Law Review, Volume XI, Number 320
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Nicole Dwyer associate Wiggin and Dana
Associate

Nicole Dwyer is an associate in Wiggin and Dana’s New Haven office.

Before joining Wiggin and Dana, Nicole worked as a summer associate and law clerk with the firm of Brenner, Saltzman, and Wallman LLP.

Nicole received her J.D. summa cum laude from Quinnipiac University School of Law, where she was the Editor-in-Chief of the Quinnipiac Law Review and received Distinguished Academic Achievement Awards in Contracts II, Constitutional Law, Torts, Employment Discrimination Law, and Commercial Law. She also received the Academic Excellence Award, Superior...

203-498-4388
Mary Gambardella Litigation lawyer Wiggin Dana
Partner

Mary brings decades of experience in helping clients comply with ever-changing labor laws and regulations, as well as in managing employment challenges such as sensitive terminations, sexual harassment, reductions in workforce, discrimination claims, and severance agreements. She is a proactive resource for clients seeking her counsel on a variety of human resource issues before they become a costly crisis, as well as a fierce advocate when crises arise.

Mary is Chair of the firm’s Labor, Employment and Benefits Department and regularly represents employers in...

+1 203 498 4382
Michael L. Miller Real Estate Lawyer Wiggin & Dana Law Firm
Partner

Mike is a Partner in Wiggin and Dana’s Real Estate, Environmental and Energy Department in the New Haven office. An experienced environmental, health and safety (EHS) attorney, Mike’s practice is largely comprised of three distinct categories of EHS legal representation: transactional support; compliance and risk counseling; and litigation.

Mike has over thirteen years of EHS compliance and risk management experience. His passion for client service, substantive and technical knowledge and geographic breadth of experience (having worked on matters in over 20 states) contribute to his...

203-498-4438
Caroline Park Labor and employment lawyer Wiggin Dana
Counsel

Caroline is Counsel in Wiggin and Dana's Labor, Employment and Benefits Department and is a member of the firm’s Diversity Committee.

Caroline’s practice encompasses federal and state court litigation and the arbitration and mediation of employment discrimination claims, wrongful discharge claims, wage and hour claims, disputes over the enforcement of covenants not to compete, and other employment-related disagreements. Caroline also represents employers in cases involving claims of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, before the Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities...

+1 203 498 4317
Lawrence Peikes Employment litigation lawyer Wiggin Dana
Partner

Larry represents the interests of management in all aspects of the employer-employee relationship and is particularly experienced in litigation defense. He has advocated for employers in a wide range of employment cases—before arbitrators, mediators, and government agencies as well as in state and federal courts. In a field where most attorneys rarely appear before a judge, let alone a jury, Larry has successfully tried cases on both the federal and state levels. Despite his extensive courtroom experience, Larry is first and foremost dedicated to finding the best, most...

203-363-7609
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement