October 28, 2020

Volume X, Number 302

Advertisement

October 28, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 27, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 26, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York Proposes New Rules to Modernize Securities Filings Affecting Private Funds and Significant Exam and Registration Requirements on "Finders"

Recent proposed changes to New York’s securities regulations would require private funds offered under Regulation D to make notice filings consistent with federally set timelines and impose licensing requirements for the first time on “finders”.

Specifically, on April 6, 2020, the “Department proposed sweeping revisions (“Proposed Regulations”) that would, among other things:

  • modify notice filing requirements for covered securities. Under the Proposed Regulations, SEC Form D would satisfy New York’s blue sky filing requirements for private funds offered under Rule 506 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”); and
  • require “finders” to register. The proposed regulations would define “finders” (i.e., persons that are paid to match up investors with broker-dealers) and require finders to comply with broker-dealer registration and exam requirements.

According to the Department, the Proposed Regulations would modernize the Department’s registration function, conform New York’s regulations to the federal securities registration regime and cure industry confusion. New York’s rules have not kept pace with developments in state and federal securities regulation since the enactment of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act in 1996 (NSMIA). (NSMIA limits the authority of states to regulate securities offered, and prohibits states from requiring the registration or qualification of securities issued in Rule 506 offerings. NSMIA allows states to impose notice filing requirements.)

Regulation D Offerings

Most private funds rely on Regulation D under the 1933 Act to offer and sell interests to investors without registering the offer and sale. Under the Proposed Regulations:

  • a private fund making an offering pursuant to Rule 506 under Regulation D would satisfy its New York State blue sky filing requirements by filing a Form D with the Department;

  • the deadline for Form D filings with New York would be the same deadline provided in SEC Regulation D (i.e., within 15 days after the first sale to any New York investor);
  • Form D filings would be effective for four years. However, amended Form Ds would be required whenever the private fund files an other than annual amendment to Form D with the SEC (i.e., an amendment reflecting a material change);
  • a Form D (and any associated fees) would be filed through the North American Securities Administrators Association’s (NASAA’s) electronic filing depository system. Initial and renewal filings fees would be $1,200 (for offering amounts over $500,000) and $300 (for offering amounts of $500,000 or less). Paper filings and payments of fees would be accepted “until such time as the Department of Law designates a system for exclusive electronic filings and payments”; and
  • issuers that are not incorporated or organized in New York would still need to continue to file a Form U-2 Uniform Consent to Service of Process Form with the Department.

Currently, the Department requires issuers conducting a private placement in New York to file a registration of the issuer on the Form 99, which is valid for four years. However, a number of practitioners have taken the view that New York’s filing requirements for Rule 506 offerings were inconsistent with, and preempted by, NSMIA. When the Proposed Regulations were published in the New York State Register, the New York Attorney General seemingly disagreed with this interpretation. The published notice stated that “[u]nder the proposed regulatory revisions, certain securities issuers qualifying as dealers, that may have misinterpreted the existing regulations as inapplicable, will now be explicitly compelled to file with the State and pay filing fees.”

Registration of “Finders”

New York’s broker-dealer regulation does not currently have a provision regulating finders. Under the Proposed Regulations, persons that act as finders in New York would be prohibited from receiving any compensation unless the person was registered as a broker-dealer or sales person, as appropriate. The stated purpose of this proposal is to “seek to clarify the registration and exam requirements for certain currently-undefined subclassifications of broker-dealers and investment advisers” who introduce investors to broker-dealers for compensation.

Specifically, a “finder” would be defined as “a person, firm, association, or corporation who as a part of a regular business, engages in the business of effecting transactions in securities for the account of others within or from this state, to the limited extent that such person, firm, association or corporation, receives compensation for introducing a prospective investor or investors to any broker, dealer or salesperson.” There does not appear to be any exception from this definition, which would apply to persons even if they do not have a principal place of business in New York.

Finders not associated with a registered broker-dealer would register by filing Form M-1. Finders associated with a non-FINRA member broker-dealer would be required to register by filing Form M-2. Registration for finders associated with a FINRA member broker-dealer would be effectuated by filing a Form U4. Finders would also be subject to all of the current New York exam requirements applicable to brokers, broker-dealers, and salespersons.

Next Steps

The Proposed Regulations were published in the New York State Register on April 15, 2020, available here. The Department will accept comments on its proposal through June 15, 2020.

©2020 Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 129
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Gary DeWaal, Securities Attorney, Katten Law Firm, New York
Special Counsel

Gary DeWaal focuses his practice on financial services regulatory matters. He counsels clients on the application of evolving regulatory requirements to existing businesses and structuring more effective compliance programs, as well as assists in defending and resolving regulatory disciplinary actions and enforcement matters. Gary also advises buy-side and sell-side clients, as well as trading facilities and clearing houses, on the developing laws and regulations related to cryptocurrencies and digital tokens.

Previously, Gary was a senior...

212-940-6558
Wendy E. Cohen, Financial Services Lawyer, Katten Muchin Law firm
Partner

Wendy E. Cohen represents investment managers and other sponsors of domestic and offshore securities and commodities hedge funds, funds of funds and other public and private pooled investment vehicles, as well as their service providers, including their managers, brokers, financial intermediaries and other financial institutions, and investment professionals. She provides advice on all corporate and related matters facing investment funds, including structure and organization, ongoing operations, restructuring and dissolution.

Having practiced for...

212-940-3846
Michael T. Foley, Katten, Lawyer, Finance, FINRA, Chicago
Special Counsel

Michael Foley represents broker-dealers, investment advisers and other financial services industry participants with respect to a broad spectrum of legal and regulatory matters arising under the federal securities laws.

Michael has nearly 20 years of experience in private practice and in-house at both a large, full-service broker-dealer and at an online discount broker-dealer, advising broker-dealers and other financial institutions regarding compliance with the federal securities and commodities laws, and with the regulations of the US Securities and Exchange...

312-902-5452
David Y. Dickstein, Financial Services Lawyer, Katten muchin law firm
Partner

David Dickstein represents broker-dealers, investment advisers, investment companies and hedge funds in connection with a variety of regulatory, compliance and operational matters. David regularly counsels investment advisers on registration and regulatory matters, such as the need for registration, conflict of interest disclosures, soft dollars and best execution, firm advertising and marketing, federal and state pay-to-play matters, trade allocations and personal trading. He also advises broker-dealers on registration and ongoing compliance matters, mutual fund supermarkets...

212-940-8506
Mark Goldstein, Katten Law Firm, New York, Financial Law Attorney
Special Counsel

Mark Goldstein focuses his practice on advising investment advisers, mutual funds and private investment funds. Mark has more than 25 years of experience advising clients on compliance and regulatory requirements, corporate matters, and the federal securities laws. He has extensive experience advising on the formation, distribution, structuring and on-going operational aspects of a wide array of investment products, including mutual funds, private investment funds, offshore funds, funds offered to separate accounts of insurance companies as funding vehicles for variable...

212-940-8507
Advertisement
Advertisement