September 22, 2019

September 20, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

September 19, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

New York State Passes Bill Allowing Employees to Place a Lien on Employer’s Property for Accusation of Wage Violations

The New York State Assembly and Senate have passed a potentially groundbreaking act (S2844B/A486B) (the “Act”) that would allow current or former employees to obtain liens on their employer’s personal and real property based upon only the mere accusation of wage violations.  And it arguably would allow those employees to obtain liens against individuals, including owners, managers and supervisors.

If the Act is signed by Governor Cuomo, New York would join the few states to permit such liens based on an unproven wage violation allegation.

A lien is a legal claim or a right against property. The Act, if passed, would give current and former employees priority in any bankruptcy proceeding involving the employer and, among other things, make it difficult for the employer to sell or transfer ownership of real estate.

The Act would apply to wage claims under both the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law. That would include claims relating to minimum wage, overtime, spread of hours, call-in pay, uniform maintenance pay, withheld tips, unlawful deductions from wages, or improperly taken meal and tip credits.

The Act defines employer as any person who is an “employer” under the FLSA or New York Labor Law. The definition of “employer” under these statutes is extremely broad – and includes not only the corporate entity that employs the employee, but also managers, executives, supervisors, owners, shareholders, and any other person or entity who exercises control over employees’ working conditions. Thus, this Act creates concerns for anyone who meets this broad definition of “employer.”

Importantly, under the Act, the employee would not have to prove that he or she was underpaid to file the lien. The lien could be filed on the basis of an allegation of underpayment.

If passed, the Act would also streamline the process by which employees could hold the ten largest shareholders of a non-publicly traded corporation, as well as the ten members with the largest ownership interests in a limited liability company personally liable for wage theft.

The Act also contains a provision which would allow employees and their agents to examine a business corporation and LLC’s records to obtain the shareholders’ or members’ names, addresses, and ownership value in the company.  In addition, the Act provides that a lien can remain on a property for the duration of a wage lawsuit, which can exert undue pressure on an employer to settle an otherwise defensible, or perhaps even frivolous wage claim.

Under the Act, employees would be entitled to place a lien equal to the amount of the wage claim, inclusive of damages. However, the lien is limited to the particular employee and not a putative class. Notice of a lien can be filed up to three years after the end of the employment which gave rise to the wage claim. The party seeking the lien is required to serve a copy of the notice upon the employer, as well as affix a copy to any real property identified in the lien within five days before or 30 days after filing the lien notice. The lien is filed for one year, which can be extended by a court order. Absent court approval, if the employee does not commence the foreclosure action within one year, the lien automatically extinguishes.

Employers would not be without recourse, however, as they may purchase a bond to discharge the lien at any time. Additionally, if the employer can prove that the employee willfully exaggerated the lien, the lien will be discharged and the employee would be restricted from obtaining another lien against the employer based on the same claim.

As the Act would permit employees to obtain liens against an employer’s personal and real property based upon a mere allegation of underpayment of wages, employers – including those persons who fall within the broad statutory definition of “employer” –  are incentivized even more than they had already been to ensure full compliance with all applicable wage and hour laws. To that end, employers should consider self-audits through the assistance of counsel to review all of their wage and hour practices.

This post was written with assistance from Christopher R. Shur, a 2019 Summer Associate at Epstein Becker Green.

©2019 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights reserved.

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Jeffrey H. Ruzal, epstein becker green, new york, fair labor, employment
Member

JEFFREY H. RUZAL is a Member in the Labor and Employment practice, in the New York office of Epstein Becker Green.

Mr. Ruzal's experience includes:

  • Representing employers in employment-related litigation in federal courts and before administrative agencies

  • Representing employers in the defense of putative collective actions under the Fair Labor Standards Act and class actions under the New York State Wage and Hour Law

  • ...

212-351-3762