November 28, 2022

Volume XII, Number 332

Advertisement

NLRB-Tribe Dispute Heading for En Banc Review?

We recently reported on a decision governing the NLRB’s jurisdiction over tribal casinos, NLRB v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government.  Shortly after that split decision, another panel of the Sixth Circuit handed down a decision that addressed similar issues yesterday, Soaring Eagle Casino and Resort v. NLRB .  Apparently, both panels were considering some of the same issues independently, but at the same time.  The Little River panel issued its decision first, which bound the subsequent Soaring Eagle panel.  However, in an unusual move, the latter panel expressly disagreed with the prior panel’s decision from two weeks ago but nevertheless followed it as it was obliged to do.  The second panel held:  “Given the legal framework adopted in Little River and the breadth of the majority’s holding, we must concede in this case that the casino operated by the tribe on trust land falls within the scope of the NLRA, and that the NLRB has jurisdiction over the casino.  We do not agree, however, with the Little River majority’s adoption of the Couer d’Alene framework or its analysis of Indian inherent sovereignty rights.”  This panel then embarks on an extended discussion detailing the error of the prior panel’s ways.  (It stands to reason that this opinion was initially drafted prior to receipt of the Little Eagle opinion, which then generated a need for substantial revisions).  Judge White concurred in part and dissented in part, but did agree with the majority that Little River was wrongly decided.  That means that of the six judges to consider this question in the past month, only two agreed with the framework adopted by Little River, but paradoxically that currently prevails as the law of the Circuit.

Needless to say, however, this presents an issue that is ripe for en banc review.  Although the Court has been restricting en banc review, such a flagrant disagreement between two panels certainly should attract en banc attention.  We will continue to monitor these two cases and see if petitions are filed and how the Court responds to them.

© Copyright 2022 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLPNational Law Review, Volume V, Number 184
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

With a global footprint, Squire Patton Boggs' Labor and Employment Practice Group can service your labor and employment advice needs wherever your operations may be, and whatever your line of business. Their lawyers can help you to steer a safe course through the issues, from the smallest day-to-day local queries to the largest international restructurings, negotiations and disputes.

The Labor & Employment Practice Group is one of the largest global labor and employment practices in the world with lawyers located in offices throughout Europe, Asia Pacific, the US and Latin...

44 20-7655-1473
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement