June 4, 2020

June 04, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 03, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 02, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 01, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

OFCCP Director Craig Leen Describes Agency Priorities in Comments at the National ILG Conference

On July 31, 2019, OFCCP Director Craig Leen gave the opening remarks at the National Industry Liaison Group conference in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  Director Leen described several new and renewed areas of focus for OFCCP and provided some insight into the agency’s priorities.  Polsinelli attended Director Leen’s speech and several panels at the conference in which OFCCP officials weighed in on compliance and enforcement trends.

Disability Issues

Director Leen emphatically stated that OFCCP will begin treating discrimination against individuals with disabilities in the same way it treats discrimination against other protected classes like race and gender and will begin to focus the same level of resources as are devoted to other types of discrimination.  He described this focus as a “fundamental  principle” in the agency’s future planning.

The most immediate sign of this renewed focus on disability issues is the Section 503 focused review process that OFCCP is undertaking for the first time this year.  In a panel, OFCCP Deputy Director Tina Williams and other officials described a robust focused review process.  To the surprise of many in the audience, Deputy Director Williams explained that every focused review will include an on-site interview component that is expected to last a week or longer.  OFCCP regional directors on the panel stated that compliance officers performing focused reviews will seek broad-based information about the contractor’s handling of disability accommodation and leave requests and interview individual employees about their experiences with the accommodation process.

Veterans Issues

Director Leen advised that the first list of contractors scheduled for VEVRAA focused reviews will be released around Veterans Day.  He also expressed OFCCP’s desire to evaluate whether contractors are discriminating against veterans on a systemic basis.  Director Leen also stated that OFCCP is interested in whether statistically-significant pay disparities for veteran employees may indicate violations of USERRA’s requirement that employees be held harmless for taking military leave and receive the same raises and promotions they would have received had they not taken the lease.


Director Leen directly addressed the recent Analogic decision in which an OFCCP administrative law judge strongly criticized the agency’s compensation audit approach.  He noted that the agency did not appeal the decision and pledged that senior officials have “internalized” its criticisms.  Director Leen stated that he believed Analogic’s principles are consistent with the agency’s compensation directive (2018-05), which states that compliance officers should consider how the employer actually sets compensation.  Director Leen also noted that OFCCP is preparing additional compensation guidance for public release.

Director Leen also explained that OFCCP will focus on identifying actual discriminatory policies or practices that cause pay disparities, rather than asserting that the mere existence of a statistically-significant disparity alone shows discrimination.  That said, Director Leen hedged on whether the agency will continue to find violations in the absence of anecdotal evidence of discrimination, stating that such evidence was necessary in “most” cases.  This qualification implies that OFCCP will find violations based solely on statistical evidence in at least some instances.  Two senior OFCCP economists echoed this focus in a panel, noting that the agency is moving to the use of “descriptive statistics” that seek to identify the root causes of disparities and hone in on whether those causes are the result of discrimination.

Transparency, Certainty, and Efficiency

Director Leen identified transparency, certainty, and efficiency as being OFCCP’s “bedrock” principles.  Director Leen committed to continuing to provide compliance guidance to contractors through the issuance of additional opinion letters and FAQ documents.  He also noted that the agency plans to establish an online help desk through which contractors can anonymously seek compliance guidance with the agency’s answers posted for public reference.  OFCCP will also release technical assistance guidance on Section 503, VEVRAA, and promotions after it undertakes its first rounds of focused reviews in those areas.

Director Leen expressed his desire for OFCCP to take a more collaborative approach with contractors, particularly at the desk audit and conciliation stages.  OFCCP intends to pursue settlements and Early Resolution Programs to seek to resolve alleged discriminatory practices and quickly bring relief to affected employees.  Director Leen generally rejected OFCCP’s former “active case enforcement” methodology and stated that the agency will now focus on reviewing the practices of a greater number of contractors in a quicker and more efficient manner.

While Director Leen’s comments provided some reassurance for the contractor community, they also identified several new areas of focus that contractors should seek to address before they face an in-depth focused review.

© Polsinelli PC, Polsinelli LLP in California


About this Author

Conne Bertram Government Contract Lawyer Polsinelli Law Firm

Connie focuses her practice on whistleblower, trade secrets, government contractors and employee mobility counseling and litigation. She frequently conducts confidential internal investigations involving executive-level employees, including alleged fraud, theft or misuse of company data, trade secrets, sexual harassment and code of conduct violations. She routinely counsels, investigates and litigates restrictive covenant and trade secrets disputes between employers and former employees.

Connie has defended complex whistleblower, trade secrets and restrictive...

Jack Blum Polsinelli Employment Attorney

Jack Blum is an associate in the firm’s Employment Disputes, Litigation, and Arbitration practice, where he represents employers in connection with a wide range of employment law issues. Jack has extensive experience in defending employers against claims by their employees in federal and state courts, as well as before government agencies like the EEOC, Department of Labor, and state human rights commissions. Jack aggressively defends his client’s personnel practices and decisions while not losing sight of their underlying business goals and objectives. Jack represents clients in all aspects of complex employment litigation and has advised and defended employer clients regarding a wide variety of employee claims, including:

• Employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation
• Wage and hour
• Employment contract disputes
• Independent contractor/employee misclassification audits 
• Tort claims arising out of the employment relationship

Jack also has extensive experience representing parties in litigation arising from employee mobility, including claims involving non-competition, non-solicitation, and confidentiality agreements as well as the misappropriation of trade secrets. Significantly, Jack has experience in both prosecuting and defending these claims and is, therefore, able to offer clients a well-rounded assessment of their options and courses of action. Jack also has experience redressing employee data breaches under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Jack also has a background in employment counseling, where he has worked closely with in-house counsel, human resources personnel, and business executives to craft personnel policies that meet the client’s business requirements while complying with applicable laws. Jack has particular experience in assisting clients with issues relating to employee/independent contractor classifications, and regularly advises clients regarding the defensibility of classifications, drafts independent contractor agreements to provide the strongest possible arguments in support of the classification, and defends misclassification claims asserted by employees and government agencies. Jack also walks clients through sensitive personnel actions to reduce the potential for litigation or at least best position the client in the event that litigation is inevitable. Jack draws heavily upon this counseling experience in representing clients in litigation.

During law school, Jack served as a legal intern in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Inspector General where he contributed to several high-profile internal investigations, and also interned with the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.