February 1, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 32


January 31, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 30, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

President Biden Calls on Congress to Avoid Mass Railroad Strike

President Joe Biden has asked Congress to step in and enact legislation in the hopes of preventing a nationwide railway strike.

The move comes after four of 12 national railroad labor unions rejected a proposed bargaining agreement with the freight rail carriers, despite the president’s September involvement to broker a deal between the parties.

Congress will consider passing legislation, pursuant to the Railway Labor Act (RLA), to force a deal before the upcoming strike deadline.


Beginning November 2019, 12 unions and the railway carriers began negotiations wage increases, additional paid days off, and improved health care benefits, among other issues.

After months of unsuccessful negotiations, President Biden issued an Executive Order in July 2022 establishing a Presidential Emergency Board (PEB), which issued recommendations for the agreement. See Report to the President by Emergency Board No. 250.

On September 15, 2022, the parties reached a tentative agreement, subject to ratification by each union’s membership. The agreement included generous wage increases, but it did not fully address workers’ wish for paid sick days and emergency days off.

Over the course of the last three months, however, workers in only eight of the unions voted to ratify the agreement, with four rejecting it. Since a quarter of the unions failed to ratify the deal, rail workers in all 12 of the unions would strike or observe picket lines, effectively shutting down most of the national rail system. Rail moves 40 percent of long-distance freight in the United States, and any such strike would cause severe economic concerns across the country.

To avert a strike, Congress will look to the RLA, which allows it to enact legislation implementing the terms of the last agreement.

The Railway Labor Act

A key purpose of the RLA is to prevent strikes. The RLA, indeed, states that its objective is to avoid “any interruption to commerce or to the operation of any carrier engaged therein” and provide “for the prompt and orderly settlement of all disputes concerning rates of pay, rules, or working conditions.” 45 U.S.C § 151a.

The RLA also provides dispute resolution processes and establishes the National Railroad Adjustment Board and the National Mediation Board (NMB) to handle disputes between rail unions and carriers.

If the NMB determines that the labor dispute could “substantially threaten to interrupt interstate commerce to a degree such as to deprive any section of the country of essential transportation service,” the NMB notifies the president, who may then issue an executive order to create the PEB to investigate and make a report on the dispute. The PEB then has 30 days to issue its recommendations to the president and the parties remain in a “cooling off” period. 45 U.S.C § 160.

The parties are in the cooling-off period, which will expire as early as December 9, 2022. The unions have agreed on a strike date of December 9, 2022.

Importantly, the RLA also gives Congress the authority to intervene in rail matters affecting interstate commerce by enacting legislation to impose the contract mediated between the parties or create an alternative agreement. This move would require a joint resolution by Congress and the president’s signature. As all other dispute resolution processes under the RLA have been exhausted, Congressional leaders have indicated they will vote on whether to impose the agreement or risk a strike.

Labor and Political Developments

While probably no one really wants a rail strike, the considerations involved are more complex than they might first appear. The rail carriers believe they offered significant economic improvement and employees can use vacation time for necessary sick leave and other protections. They also point to the importance of the carriers’ maintaining functional schedules, which can be disrupted by too many last-minute callouts.

The unions complain that workers are allegedly held to “draconian” attendance standards and their requests for more leeway for time off due to unexpected circumstances should be granted. It is an emotional issue, one which has support among much of the rank and file.

Yet, railroads (like airlines) are held to a different standard than most businesses since much of what they do is closely tied to interstate commerce and their service spans many states.

Further, President Biden campaigned as a pro-union president and has sought to deliver on his pro-union promises. Some Democratic-leaning senators (e.g., Bernie Sanders) and normally pro-business Republican senators (e.g., Marc Rubio) have argued that workers and the rail carriers should work out their differences in collective bargaining (presumably, including strikes).

However, the consequences of such a strike are too severe to be endured in an economy still trying to right itself coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic and managing worldwide energy shocks this close to major holidays. On November 29, the White House announced it will seek Congressional action and key leaders in both houses (Charles Schumer and Mitch McConnell in the Senate, and Nancy Pelosi and, more ambiguously, Kevin McCarthy in the House) indicated they felt a bill to impose the last contract as proposed would pass. The rail carriers welcomed the news. Although eight of the unions had already ratified this same deal, some workers and unions complained bitterly.

In a move that could mitigate union contentions, a separate piece of legislation was announced that would increase paid sick leave — a key issue for rail workers throughout negotiations. If passed, it would add seven paid sick days annually, with the details for implementation to be negotiated between the parties within 30 days from the date the legislation is enacted, or if negotiations fail, requires binding arbitration within the 30 days thereafter. This measure goes beyond the terms of the tentative agreement.

However, by putting the paid leave provision in a separate bill, Congressional leaders have made it likely that the main bill imposing the tentative agreements will pass (on November 30, 2022, the House passed the main bill on a 290-137 vote, while the paid leave bill passed more narrowly, by a 221-207 vote).

Under the RLA, passage of the main bill by both the Senate and the House and its signature by President Biden will eliminate the risk of a rail strike.

Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2023National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 334

About this Author

Jonathan J. Spitz, Jackson Lewis Law Firm, Labor Employment Attorney, Atlanta

Jonathan J. Spitz is a Principal in the Atlanta, Georgia, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. He is Co-Leader of the firm’s Labor and Preventive Practices Group.

Mr. Spitz lectures extensively, conducts management training, and advises clients with respect to legislative and regulatory initiatives, corporate strategies, business ethics, social media issues and the changing regulatory landscape. He understands the practical and operational needs of corporate America, helping design pragmatic strategies to minimize risk and maximize performance. He has represented...

Richard F. Vitarelli Harford  Connecticut Labor Relations Lawyer at Jackson Lewis Law Firm

Richard F. Vitarelli is a Principal in the Hartford, Connecticut, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. Part of the firm’s national labor practice, he has over two decades of experience representing employers nationally in strategic labor relations, collective bargaining, and union organizing, including in the context of mergers and acquisitions, corporate restructuring and contract administration. He serves as general labor and employment counsel for employers and multi-employer associations in various industries, including construction, manufacturing, health care and senior living,...

James M Stone Labor & Employment Attorney Jackson Lewis Cleveland, OH

James M. Stone is a principal of the Cleveland, Ohio, office of Jackson Lewis P.C. From the opening of the office in 2006 until early 2020, Jim served as office managing principal in Cleveland, when he stepped down to focus on his busy practice and increased task force activities within practice groups and industry teams.

With more than 25 years of experience in labor and employment law, he has conducted more than 120 negotiations with unions, represented companies in hundreds of employment discrimination, wrongful discharge, and other claims in court and...

James Verdi employment litigation lawyer Jackson Lewis

James Verdi is an Associate in the Cleveland, Ohio office of Jackson Lewis P.C. James focuses his practice on representing employers in employment litigation and labor relations matters including collective bargaining, unfair labor practice charges, unlawful discrimination, accommodation, and leave issues.

Prior to joining Jackson Lewis, Mr. Verdi worked for the United States Postal Service, the nation’s second largest employer, where he first-chaired more than 20 administrative employment hearings and national arbitrations. He provided advice on various...