January 24, 2022

Volume XII, Number 24

Advertisement
Advertisement

January 24, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

January 21, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Reminder to Employers Regarding EEO-1 Reporting Obligations

As 2021 comes to an end, many employers are preparing to meet record and reporting obligations. For employers with 100 or more employees who are required to file the EEO-1 Component 1 Report (EEO-1 Report) annually, this may involve ensuring that the relevant personnel information is accurate. While the annual deadline for submitting the EEO-1 Report is typically March 31 (subject to change and extension), employers must generally choose a “snapshot” period for their EEO-1 Report by selecting one pay period in the fourth quarter of the relevant survey year (i.e., the year prior to submission). One issue related to reporting obligations that has arisen in recent years is how to properly report employee with non-binary genders on the EEO-1 Report.

To provide background, the EEO-1 Report requires that employers report their annual workforce data, organized by location, job category, race/ethnicity, and gender. In the past, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) provided employers with two options for reporting an employee’s gender on the EEO-1 Report: male or female. However, as more employers strive for LGBTQIA+ inclusion and gender inclusivity in their workplaces, reporting of employees’ gender has posed some questions for employers, especially in light of recent state laws. These laws include allowing individuals to designate a non-binary gender marker on government documents such as driver’s licenses and requiring that employers recognize a non-binary employee’s preferred gender markers, among other things. Some states, such as California, expressly require that employers report non-binary employees in order to comply with state reporting obligations such as filing of pay data reports. In 2019, the EEOC released guidance which advises that employers may choose, but are not required, to report non-binary genders in the comment box on the Certification Page in the EEO-1 Report by prefacing the data with the phrase “Additional Employee Data.” With that option, employers can account for non-binary genders on the EEO-1 Report.

Based on this guidance, and in light of changes to various state laws, employers may wish to revise their voluntary self-identification forms by providing employees with non-binary options for self-identification. This change could increase the likelihood that employees will provide accurate responses, promote gender inclusivity, and avoid inconsistencies in data and information in light of the fact that employees may possess state-issued government identification documents that indicate a non-binary gender choice.

This week’s post was co-authored by Robinson+Cole Labor and Employment Group lawyer Emily A. Zaklukiewicz.

Copyright © 2022 Robinson & Cole LLP. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 308
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Abby Warren Labor and Employment Attorney
Associate

Abby Warren is a member of the firm's Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration Group, where she represents employers in labor and employment matters. She focuses her practice on counseling private sector employers, including multinational corporations, health care organizations, educational institutions, and manufacturers, in all areas of employment law. Abby also defends employers in federal and state court and before administrative agencies. In addition to counseling and litigation, she provides workplace training for clients and conducts workplace investigations.

...

860.275.8215
Emily A. Zaklukiewicz Labor and Employment Attorney Robinson & Cole Hartford, CT
Associate

Emily A. Zaklukiewicz focuses her practice on counseling private sector employers in all areas of labor and employment law and defending employers in federal and state court and before administrative agencies. She is a member of the firm’s Labor, Employment, Benefits + Immigration Group. 

Emily graduated first in her law school class, serving as the Managing Editor of Stetson Law Review, as an Associate Editor of the Journal of International Aging Law & Policy, and as a committee member on the Student Leadership Development Committee. She was also a member of...

860.275.8262
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement