June 17, 2021

Volume XI, Number 168

Advertisement

June 16, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

SEC Chair Gensler Testifies on “Unprecedented Surge” in SPACs

SPACs remain on everyone’s mind, especially the country’s chief regulator.  On May 26, 2021, SEC Chair Gary Gensler testified before the U.S. House Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government on “key capital market trends” that will impact SEC resources in the coming years. And the very first topic he raised – Initial Public Offerings and Special Purpose Acquisition Companies – was of no surprise to most market watchers.

 While Gensler noted the market is on track to offer “more traditional IPOs than there were during the dot-com peak of 2000,” he also remarked that the capital markets are “witnessing an unprecedented surge in non-traditional IPOs by special purpose acquisition companies.”  The SEC has already received 700 S-1 filings in 2021, compared to 13 such filings in all of 2016.

Gensler also made news by stating he refers to de-SPAC transactions – when a SPAC merges with a target company – as “target IPOs” as they “enable target companies to access public markets for the first time.” This line of reasoning echoes language used in Acting Director of the Division of Corporate Finance John Coates’ April 8, 2021 release on “SPACs, IPOs, and Liability Risk under the Securities Laws.”

Further, the SEC has noted a rise in primary direct listings, “where companies can sell shares directly on exchanges without a traditional underwritten public offering.” Gensler noted this may be a new trend that calls upon even more SEC resources.

Beyond requiring significant SEC resources, the recent rise in SPACs prompted Gensler to highlight two key questions that the SEC will have to address. First, “are SPAC investors being appropriately protected? Are retail investors getting the appropriate and accurate information they need at each stage — the first blank-check IPO stage and the second target IPO stage?”

Second, “how do SPACs fit in to our mission to maintain fair, orderly, and efficient markets?”  Gensler, supported by a recent study, noted that it could be the case the “SPACs are less efficient than traditional IPOs.” By receiving a twenty percent promotion, this study found “SPAC sponsors generate significant dilution and costs.”  Coupled with the common occurrence that the investors in private investments in public equity (PIPEs) “are buying at a discount to a post-target IPO price[,] [i]t may be that the retail public is bearing much of these costs.”

Gensler concluded his thoughts on SPACs by noting he asked SEC staff to “consider what recommendations they would make to the Commission for possible rules or guidance in this area.”

© 2021 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 160
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Corey I. Rogoff Securities Litigation Lawyer Proskauer Law Firm
Associate

Corey Rogoff is a litigation associate in Washington, D.C. with a focus on securities litigation. Corey earned his J.D. from Columbia Law School, where he was a Harlan Fiske Stone Scholar and served on the Columbia Journal of Tax Law. While a summer associate at Proskauer, Corey seconded at Major League Baseball’s Washington Nationals franchise. Corey earned a B.A. in Political Science from Johns Hopkins University.

202-416-6884
Advertisement
Advertisement