September 21, 2021

Volume XI, Number 264

Advertisement

September 20, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Staffing Company Criminally Indicted for Targeting School Nurses in Wage-Fixing and No-Poach Scheme

The Department of Justice (“DOJ”) announced yesterday a criminal indictment returned by a federal grand jury in Las Vegas, Nevada charging a health care staffing company and its former manager of entering into and engaging in a conspiracy with a competitor to allocate and fix the wages of employee nurses in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).

According to the one-count felony indictment filed in the District of Nevada, VDA OC LLC (formerly Advantage On Call LLC) (“Advantage”) and “Company A,” both health care staffing companies, agreed not to recruit or hire nurses staffed by each other—commonly called a no-poach agreement.  They also allegedly agreed not to raise the wages of their nurses.  No-poach agreements and wage-fixing agreements are per se unlawful under the Sherman Act.  The investigation was a joint effort by the DOJ, the FBI, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada.

The Clark County School District (“CCSD”) provides specialized nursing services for its medically fragile students.  In 2013, CCSD announced a Request for Proposal inviting bids from nurse staffing companies to provide such services to its medically fragile students.  Advantage and Company A each won a contract to provide such services to the school district.  Advantage and Company A were the two primary providers of contract nurses to CCSD.  From around October 2016 to around July 2017, Advantage, along with its regional manager Ryan Hee, and Company A, along with its account manager “Individual 1,” allegedly conspired to eliminate competition for the services of nurses by entering into no-poach and wage-fixing agreements with each other.  The indictment cites communications between the companies stating that they “will not recruit” nurses from each other.  One cited email between the companies stated “I am glad we can work together through this, and assure that we will not let the field employees run our businesses moving forward.”  Other communications regarding their alleged agreement not to increase wages included an email stating “[i]f anyone threatens us for more money, we will tell them to kick rocks!”

The statutory maximum penalty for a violation of the Sherman Act is 10 years in prison and a fine of $1 million for individuals, and $100 million for corporations.  (The maximum fine can be increased up to twice the gain derived from the violation, or twice the loss suffered by the victims.)

This indictment continues the DOJ’s active enforcement against anticompetitive conduct in labor markets over the past few months.  In December 2020, the DOJ brought its first criminal case involving employer wage-fixing.  Our blog post regarding that indictment can be found here.  And in January, the DOJ brought its first criminal case involving no-poach agreements.  Our blog post regarding that case can be found here.

This recent string of criminal indictments demonstrates the antitrust enforcers’ commitment to protecting competition related to employment and human resources issues.  Companies and their employees, particularly those involved with recruiting and hiring, must be mindful of the antitrust risks.

©1994-2021 Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. All Rights Reserved.National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 90
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Bruce Sokler, Mintz Levin Law Firm, Washington DC, Health Care, Antitrust and Litigation Attorney
Member

Bruce is Chair of the Antitrust Section and in his over 30 years in private practice, he has developed extensive experience in both antitrust and communications regulation, including associated First Amendment and copyright law matters

In the antitrust area, Bruce’s practice includes antitrust counseling and representation in connection with federal and state governmental matters, as well as private antitrust litigation. He counsels and has represented Fortune 100 companies, not-for-profits, start-up entities, and domestic and international joint ventures. Bruce has been involved in...

202-434-7303
Farrah Short, Mintz Levin Law Firm, Washington DC, Health Care, Corporate Law Attorney
Special Counsel

Farrah advises on all aspects of antitrust and competition law, including merger review, competitor collaborations, government investigations, private class action litigation, and general antitrust compliance.

Farrah specializes in counseling clients through the Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) merger review process at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice, including responding to Second Requests and providing substantive antitrust risk analysis for strategic acquisitions. She has obtained antitrust clearance for major,...

202-585-3518
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement