August 1, 2021

Volume XI, Number 213

Advertisement

July 30, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Third Circuit Rejects Claim for Lifetime Medical Benefits

Several retired employees of Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc. sued their former employer alleging that they were entitled to lifetime healthcare benefits, and the unilateral changes made by Dominion to their post-retirement medical benefits violated ERISA.  The Third Circuit concluded that the retirees failed to state a claim.  Applying ordinary principles of contract interpretation, the Court concluded that the CBA did not “clearly and expressly” vest the retirees with lifetime benefits.  In so ruling, the Court rejected the retirees’ argument that because the Plan required union consent before altering medical benefits and also did not include a general durational clause, it could be inferred that “the parties clearly expressed their intent to vest post-retirement medical benefits.”  The “absence of a termination clause combined with a consent clause does not clearly and expressly vest retirees” with lifetime benefits, said the Third Circuit.  The case is Blankenship v. Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc., No. 19-3374, 2020 WL 3397740 (3d Cir. 2020).

© 2021 Proskauer Rose LLP. National Law Review, Volume X, Number 181
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

The complexity and heightened scrutiny surrounding executive compensation arrangements and employee benefits plans and their assets continue to grow. Proskauer’s Employee Benefits, Executive Compensation & ERISA Litigation Practice Center is at the forefront of addressing the unfolding legal and business developments affecting these arrangements and plans, and is formulating innovative, practical and proactive legal strategies.

The depth of our group, both in number of lawyers and years of experience, enables us to represent clients with...

202-416-5850
Advertisement
Advertisement