October 27, 2021

Volume XI, Number 300

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 26, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 25, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Untangling California's Shareholder Vote Requirements For Filling Vacancies On The Board

Section 305 of the California Corporations Code sets forth the rules for filling vacancies on the board of directors.  Today's post discusses the somewhat confusing requirements of the statute as it pertains to the filling of of vacancies by the shareholders.  As an initial matter, the shareholders may elect a director at any time to fill any vacancy that has not been filled by the directors. 

If the election occurs at a meeting, then the directors who receive the highest number of votes up to the number of vacancies to be filled will be elected.  The number of votes that a shareholder may cast for a candidate will depend upon whether cumulative voting is available and, if so, whether it has been properly and timely invoked.

Matters become a bit more complicated when the shareholders fill the vacancy by written consent without a meeting.  In that case, the number of votes required depends upon whether the vacancy was created by removal.  If the vacancy was created by removal, then a vacancy may be filled only be the unanimous consent of all of the shares entitled to vote for the election of directors.  In widely held corporations, this won't be an option as a practical matter and a meeting will be required.  If the vacancy was not created by removal, then the vacancy may be filled with the consent of a majority of the shares entitled to vote.  

© 2010-2021 Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 244
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Keith Paul Bishop, Corporate Transactions Lawyer, finance securities attorney, Allen Matkins Law Firm
Partner

Keith Bishop works with privately held and publicly traded companies on federal and state corporate and securities transactions, compliance, and governance matters. He is highly-regarded for his in-depth knowledge of the distinctive corporate and regulatory requirements faced by corporations in the state of California.

While many law firms have a great deal of expertise in federal or Delaware corporate law, Keith’s specific focus on California corporate and securities law is uncommon. A former California state regulator of securities and financial institutions, Keith has decades of...

949-851-5428
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement