October 16, 2021

Volume XI, Number 289

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 15, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 14, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

October 13, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

U.S. Supreme Court Finds 2012 National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Recess Appointments Unconstitutional

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that President Obama's January 2012 recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) were unconstitutional. Noel Canning v. NLRB, Case No. 12-1281 (June 26, 2014), has been closely watched by observers because of the constitutional issues involved and its potential to set aside a number of controversial decisions issued by the NLRB in 2012 and 2013.

In today's decision, the Court found that the President lacked the constitutional authority to make the recess appointments because the Senate was not actually in recess when the appointments were made. A prior Supreme Court ruling found that the NLRB needs three validly appointed members to have a quorum to operate. As such, effectively all of the Board's decisions issued between January 2012, when the recess appointments were made, through July 2013, when the President struck a deal with Congress that resulted in the confirmation of new appointments to the NLRB, have been invalidated.

The Supreme Court's ruling is not only a significant development regarding the appointment powers of the President and the role of Congress in those appointments, it will also require current NLRB members to reconsider a wide variety of controversial decisions issued by their predecessors. Those decisions included rulings that:

  • substantially changed the law on employer regulation of social media activities;

  • tried to outlaw many employee arbitration agreements;

  • restricted the ability of employers to maintain the confidentiality of workplace investigations;
  • required employers to continue collecting dues from employees after union contracts expired; and

  • required employers to disclose almost all witnesses statements to unions if unions requested them.

© 2021 Vedder PriceNational Law Review, Volume IV, Number 177
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Kenneth F. Sparks, Vedder Price Law Firm, Labor employment attorney
Shareholder

Kenneth F. Sparks is a shareholder with over 20 years of experience in labor and employment matters.  He represents and advises private and public employers in complicated labor law and litigation matters nationwide. Among his areas of concentration are union organizing and collective bargaining, including development and implementation of integrated responses to all of the litigation, publicity, and strike matters that can and often do become a part of organizing and collective bargaining.  He has negotiated numerous collective bargaining agreements, tried cases before the National Labor...

312-609-7787
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement