July 15, 2020

Volume X, Number 197

July 14, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 13, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

USTR Finds China’s IP Practices Cause at Least $50 Billion in Harm: Proposed Tariffs and Investment Restrictions Ratchet Up U.S.-China Trade Tensions

Earlier today, the administration announced its findings that China’s theft of U.S. technologies and intellectual property (“IP”) have caused at least $50 billion in harm to the U.S. economy per year. In response, President Trump issued an order announcing its intent to impose additional tariffs on Chinese imports, curtail Chinese investment in the United States, and challenge Chinese technology licensing rules in the World Trade Organization (“WTO”). This announcement caps the administration’s seven-month investigation of China’s IP practices. 

The administration plans to solicit public comments on proposed additional 25 percent tariffs covering certain products from sectors such as aerospace, information communication technology, and machinery, which have benefited from China’s IP policies. The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) has indicated that it will publish a proposed product list within “the next several days,” which will start a 30-day public comment period, after which USTR will publish the final product list in the Federal Register. 

These tariffs would be the latest in a series of new U.S. duties. Earlier this year, President Trump imposed tariffs on imported solar cells and panels and washing machines following a pair of safeguard trade cases under Section 201 of the Trade Act of 1974. And on March 8, the administration announced steel and aluminum tariffs pursuant to Section 232 national security investigations, due to take effect on March 23, 2018. 

In addition to the tariff measures, the presidential memorandum directs the Secretary of the Treasury to propose within 60 days, in consultation with other agencies, executive action “to address concerns about investment in the United States directed or facilitated by China in industries or technologies deemed important to the United States.” The scope of these restrictions is unclear for now, but could implicate ongoing debates about expanding the jurisdiction of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), which has reviewed and blocked numerous Chinese transactions involving U.S. entities on national security grounds.

The WTO challenge will target China’s discriminatory IP licensing practices, based on a statement from the president. According to USTR, U.S. and other foreign companies are required to license their technologies to Chinese firms on non-market-based terms favoring the Chinese party. By contrast, these restrictions do not govern licensing agreements between two Chinese entities under similar circumstances. 

International Trade; Public Policy and Government Affairs

The actions announced today mark the culmination of the investigation launched by the USTR in August 2017 under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 301”) of China’s technology transfer and other IP practices. In particular, USTR investigated “whether acts, policies, and practices of the Government of China related to technology transfer, intellectual property, and innovation are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce.” The statute authorizes a broad range of possible retaliatory tools—including any “appropriate and feasible action within the power of the president”—that the president may direct, not limited to industries directly linked to identified harms. Today, the USTR released a report outlining its findings that China’s IP policies are unreasonable or discriminatory and burden or restrict U.S. commerce.

Beijing has signaled that it is prepared to deploy “all necessary measures” in response to any U.S. trade actions that it views as running afoul of international trade rules. China could retaliate in a number of ways, including by imposing tariffs that hurt U.S. sectors with domestic political leverage, such as agriculture. For example, following the imposition of tariffs on solar cells and panels, China appeared to respond by self-initiating an antidumping investigation into sorghum imported from the United States. Beyond tit-for-tat retaliation, China will almost certainly challenge U.S. trade actions through the WTO. U.S. companies with business interests in China should also be prepared for more informal and opaque actions that impede their business goals in China. 

Robert Wang also contributed to this post.

© 2020 Covington & Burling LLPNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 82


About this Author

Christopher Adams Regulatory and public policy attorney, Covington
Senior Advisor

Christopher Adams advises clients on matters involving China and the region. A non-lawyer, Mr. Adams recently served as the Senior Coordinator for China Affairs at the Treasury Department. He coordinated China policy issues across the U.S. government, led negotiations with China on a broad range of trade and investment issues, managed the highest level U.S.-China economic policy dialogues for the Obama and Trump administrations, and advised the Treasury Secretary and other cabinet officials.

Mr. Adams helped develop and implement U.S. trade policy toward China...

Marney Cheek, International trade attorney, Covington

Marney Cheek is co-chair of the firm’s Arbitration Practice Group. She represents both states and corporate clients in complex international disputes, drawing upon her expertise in public international law, investment, and trade matters. She handles international disputes before numerous tribunals, advises on complex commercial and investment treaty cases, and litigates international law issues in U.S. Courts. Her practice spans a range of jurisdictions and industries. She is recognized by Chambers and Legal 500 as a leading arbitration practitioner.

Alan Larson, Regulatory and public policy lawyer, Covington
Senior Advisor

Alan Larson provides clients with strategic advice, counseling and representation at the intersection of international business and public policy. A Ph.D. economist, decorated diplomat and non-lawyer, Mr. Larson advises clients on high stakes international challenges. His trouble shooting takes him to all parts of the world. His practice encompasses international investment and acquisitions; sanctions and trade compliance; international energy transactions, international aviation and international trade. He has helped win approval of the U.S. Committee on Foreign...

Timothy Stratford, International trade lawyer, Covington

Tim Stratford is managing partner in Covington & Burling LLP’s Beijing office and a member of the International Trade, Corporate and Public Policy Practice Groups.  Mr. Stratford’s practice is focused on advising international clients doing business in China and assisting Chinese companies seeking to expand their businesses globally.  As a former Assistant U.S. Trade Representative, Mr. Stratford is the most senior former U.S. trade official working as a member of the U.S. business community in China.  Except for the five years he spent in Washington, D.C. in...

+86 10 59 10 0508
John Veroneau, Regulatory and public policy lawyer, Covington

John Veroneau is a Chambers’ ranked international trade lawyer and is a partner in the International Trade Practice Group. Having served in senior positions in both Executive and Legislative branches, he provides legal and strategic advice to clients on a broad range of international trade and other public policy matters.