July 15, 2020

Volume X, Number 197

July 15, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 14, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

July 13, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Democrat Lawmakers Introduce Legislation to End Forced Arbitration Clauses

Last week, two US Representatives introduced the Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal (FAIR) Act. The goal of this bill is to increase Americans’ rights to seek justice and accountability through jury trials in the Court system as opposed to corporate sanctioned arbitration. The NJ State Constitution provides for a jury trial in cases involving money damages under the Seventh Amendment.

The House Bill, if passed, would eliminate forced arbitration clauses in employment, consumer, and civil rights cases unless all parties enter them voluntarily. The bill comes after Google recently announced it would end forced arbitration for all disputes. Google employees appeared alongside lawmakers during the FAIR Act announcement.

Forced arbitration requires an employee or consumer to submit any dispute to binding arbitration, even under circumstances involving malpractice and personal injury. In arbitration, an arbitrator or panel decides the dispute which is binding and usually confidential.

Most arbitration awards are lower than those reached in Court, and the defendants or corporations cannot be forced to provide the evidence within their control to support the plaintiff’s claims which can defeat them. Arbitration is a process that generally favors the corporation or entity over the individual.

Forced arbitration is particularly notorious in nursing home and assisted living facilities settings. Families often don’t understand what they are agreeing to when they sign them, and often feel pressured into signing the myriad of documents presented to them so they can get their loved ones the care they need.

It is only after a family realizes a loved one has been neglected and attempts to sue the facility that they learn they have been forced into arbitration unknowingly, and given up their constitutional right to a jury trial.

In 2016, the Obama Administration attempted to prohibit the use of binding arbitration agreements as a condition of admission in nursing homes. Unfortunately, the regulation was in litigation when the Trump Administration took office and stopped supporting it. Passing the FAIR Act would eliminate these agreements and protect elderly residents and their loved ones.

COPYRIGHT © 2020, STARK & STARKNational Law Review, Volume IX, Number 70


About this Author

 Denise Mariani, Stark Law Firm, Lawrenceville, New Jersey, Nursing Home Liabilities, Patient Arbitration Lawyer

Denise Mariani is a Shareholder and Chair of the Nursing Home Negligence litigation group. For over 20 years, she has fought tirelessly to defend the rights of those who have been injured or killed through the negligence of others. As the Chair of the Nursing Home Negligence litigation group, Ms. Mariani has found her passion representing the families of residents and patients who, through negligence or abuse, have died or been seriously injured in a long-term care facility.

Sharri Warfel, Shareholder

Sherri L. Warfel is a Shareholder and trial attorney in Stark & Stark’s Nursing Home Litigation Group. Ms. Warfel concentrates her practice in representing victims of abuse and neglect in nursing homes and other medical facilities. She handles cases involving claims of pressure ulcers, fractures or injuries from preventable falls, infection, abuse, and death. Ms. Warfel also maintains a personal injury practice for clients injured in accidents. She is a seasoned trial attorney and litigator who has settled and tried hundreds of cases in her years of practice.

Sherri's primary areas of focus are in nursing law, nursing home negligence, and accident & personal injury law. 

Bar Admissions

  • New Jersey
  • The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey


  • J.D., Rutgers Law School, 1998 
  • B.S., The College of New Jersey, 1995