February 26, 2021

Volume XI, Number 57

Advertisement

February 25, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 24, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

February 23, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Fair Lending Webinar Offers Fresh Insight Into Regulators’ Views

On November 16, representatives from each of the prudential banking regulators along with DOJ, HUD, and NCUA hosted the 2017 Interagency Fair Lending Hot Topics. We participated in the event and afterwards discussed some of the most significant developments. The webinar contained several important updates on issues such as HMDA, consumer loans, and fair lending programs, among other topics. A few of the key takeaways are discussed below.

HMDA

The CFPB’s Eric Wang, Deputy Fair Lending Director of the CFPB’s Office of Fair Lending, addressed the widely criticized changes to the HMDA data reporting for which HMDA reporters must now collect and report 48 data elements (up from 23) and 110 data fields (up from 39). Wang stated that the CFPB’s initial role will be “diagnostic and corrective” rather than punitive, and that the agency will look for banks that have made good faith efforts to comply through implementation plans and policies and procedures. Specifically, he confirmed that banks will have to resubmit LAR files only where the error rates of individual fields exceed applicable thresholds rather than overall error rate calculations. Further, the new data resubmission guidelines include error tolerances for certain data fields.

Fair Lending Programs and Consumer Loans

The FRB’s Katrina Blodgett, Counsel in the Fair Lending Enforcement Section of the Division of Consumer and Community Affairs, reiterated that their risk-focused supervision approach expects a bank to tailor its compliance management system with the level of pricing discretion of that bank’s consumer loan program. Particularly, banks should clearly define the scope of discretion a loan officer has to waive, reduce, or increase fees, and should consider the use of rate sheets to track all exception variables. Rate sheets should be reviewed annually. Finally, a bank should be certain to conduct fair lending monitoring programs on a portfolio-wide basis, and should limit an analysis to individual branches only if the bank’s policies and procedures differ from branch to branch.

Advertisement
© 2020 Jones Walker LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 335
Advertisement

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS

Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Neal C. Wise, Jones Walker, Corporate Counsel Lawyer, financial institutions attorney
Associate

Neal Wise is an associate in the firm’s Banking & Financial Services and Business & Commercial Transactions Practice Groups. His practice focuses on the representation of financial institutions, such as banks and bank holding companies, and on the transactional and general corporate needs of other corporate clients. For his financial institution clients, Mr. Wise handles numerous transactions, including public and private mergers and acquisitions, public and private capital raises, branch acquisitions and dispositions, and general corporate needs. His practice...

601.949.4631
Advertisement
Advertisement