October 25, 2021

Volume XI, Number 298

Advertisement
Advertisement

October 25, 2021

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Financial Advisors: Know Your Post-Employment Restrictions Before Making a Move

The enforcement of post-employment restrictions continues in the financial services industry. Advisor Hub recently reported that Merrill Lynch and its new advisor-employee were sued by Fidelity Brokerage Services. Fidelity sought to enjoin both Merrill Lynch and the advisor from continuing solicitation of customers by the advisor. The advisor’s employment contract with Fidelity contained a one-year post-employment non-solicitation restriction that Fidelity claimed he had violated. Fidelity withdrew the suit in exchange for the advisor’s agreement to cease soliciting Fidelity customers until June 2021–one year from commencing employment with Merrill Lynch. Further, the advisor must return to Fidelity all the information in his possession concerning current and prospective customers. Apparently, Fidelity learned from at least five clients that the advisor had solicited them. The matter will be adjudicated before a FINRA arbitration panel.

Advisor Hub also reported that in an unrelated case an advisor, prior to moving to another firm, copied confidential client information while working from home due to the pandemic.

Post-Employment Restrictions

Regardless of your industry, these cases highlight the fact that post-employment restrictions have meaning and will be enforced by employers. While the COVID-19 pandemic has impaired the ability of the courts and arbitration panels to address these matters on an accelerated basis, both cases illustrate that they remain enforceable. Neither employer nor employee can afford to ignore these restrictions. They deserve serious consideration BEFORE the commencement of new employment. Ill-conceived actions like those taken by the advisors in these cases will surely impede a smooth transition, which is certainly not the objective. The employee must not take chances that could expose both employee and employer to liability for violating enforceable contractual restrictions. The main takeaway is that best practices dictate the need to conduct careful due diligence. This includes assessing the treatment of post-employment restrictions in the statutes and case law of the governing law state.

©2021 Norris McLaughlin P.A., All Rights ReservedNational Law Review, Volume X, Number 246
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

David T. Harmon Employment Attorney Norris Law Firm
Member

David T. Harmon focuses his practice on the areas of executive compensation, employment, and business law.

As Co-Chair of the firm’s Executive Compensation & Employee Benefits Group, David represents senior-level employees of both public and private companies in the negotiation of their employment packages and all associated agreements, whether at the commencement of the employment relationship through offer letters and employment agreements or at termination through severance agreements.  His successful negotiation of employment and severance packages for clients includes...

(212) 808-0700 ext.4335
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement