August 7, 2020

Volume X, Number 220

August 07, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 06, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

August 05, 2020

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

FY17 Reconciliation Instructions Expire September 30.

Procedural questions over when a budget resolution’s reconciliation instructions become stale have swirled for years.  There were three options:

  • the end of a fiscal year;

  • until the next budget resolution overtakes it (and next budget resolution could certainly affirmatively preserve it); or

  •  the end of a Congress. 

The huge news out of the Senate today (as reported by Ranking Member Bernie Sanders (D-VT, Senate Budget Committee) is that the Senate Parliamentarian has determined that the first option applies:  the reconciliation instructions that allowed a repeal/replace of Obamacare with 51 votes will expire on September 30. Given the political difficulty (and unlikelihood) of passing a repeal/replace bill in September, with all the other must-pass bills, 60 votes will now be required to consider amendments to Obamacare.   

But this also has implications for tax reform. Congressional staffers have explored the possibility of hijacking the Obamacare reconciliation instructions for tax reform. That would have involved a complicated, but potentially doable, procedure of (a) recommitting the current repeal/replace bill to the Budget Committee (an acceptable procedure as the vote that failed in July was actually a vote on an amendment in the nature of a substitute and not final passage) and (b) the Budget Committee then reporting the bill to the floor as a tax bill.  This now is also off the table. 

For the Senate to be able to depend on the procedural protections of reconciliation, Congress will have to adopt an FY18 budget resolution, which could include reconciliation instructions for both Obamacare repeal/replace and tax reform…although the budget rules permit only one bill each for revenues, spending, and debt limit, potentially requiring tax reform and healthcare to be combined into one mega reconciliation bill.

© 2020 Covington & Burling LLPNational Law Review, Volume VII, Number 244


About this Author

Muftiah M. McCartin, Regulatory & Public Policy Attorney, Covington Law Firm
Of Counsel

Muftiah McCartin is co-chair of the Public Policy Practice Group. She specializes in providing advice and guidance to clients on legislative and regulatory strategies.

Ms. McCartin has been praised by congressional leaders for “her policy and technical expertise [that] have served both sides of the aisle over many years," for "personif[ying] competence, professionalism and courtesy," and for being “one of the most able people with whom I have worked during the 30 years I have been here." Her distinguished public service career in the U.S. House of Representatives...

Ed McClellan, Covington, tax attorney

Clients rely on Ed McClellan's experienced counsel for their most technically sophisticated tax legislative challenges. Mr. McClellan has over 35 years of experience in tax policy and technical tax analysis, having spent 16 years in private practice before serving as Tax Counsel on the U.S. Senate Finance Committee. A member of the Tax and the Public Policy practices, his practice focuses on federal tax legislation.

Mr. McClellan advises clients across a wide range of industries on legislation relating to international taxation, domestic corporate taxation, corporate integration, redomiciliations, financial services, capital gains, dividend taxation, financial products, REITS, pass throughs, and accounting methods.