September 16, 2019

September 13, 2019

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

Timing Is Everything

Why This Matters

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Fort Bend County v. Davis. The message received loud and clear for employers is that timing is everything when it comes to discrimination cases and the use of claim-processing rules, embedded in Title VII, as an affirmative defense. Employers would be well served to ‘watch the clock’ and avoid losing the opportunity to receive an early dismissal. The Court ruled that federal courts can hear discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act if employers do not timely raise the defense that workers failed to first file a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) or state enforcement agencies, as Title VII requires, before filing suit in federal court. Title VII is a federal law that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sex, race, color, national origin, or religion.

Background

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, writing on behalf of the Court and affirming an appellate court ruling, held that courts need not dismiss workers’ lawsuits if they bring Title VII claims in court without first filing a charge with the EEOC.  In light of the Supreme Court’s decision, an employer faced with a Title VII lawsuit brought by an employee should quickly determine whether the employee first filed a charge with the EEOC and/or a state enforcement agency.  If not, the employer should timely bring the employee’s failure to do so to the court’s attention.

As of now, the Fort Bend County decision does not apply to cases filed under state non-discrimination laws and filed in state court.  For example, prior to filing any such cases in California, employees must file a charge with the state’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing (“DFEH”).  State courts, however, may adopt the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Fort Bend County.  That remains to be seen.

© 2019 Mitchell Silberberg & Knupp LLP

TRENDING LEGAL ANALYSIS


About this Author

Jeremy Mittman, Mitchell Silberberg Law Firm, Labor and Employment, Litigation Attorney, Los Angeles
Partner

Jeremy Mittman represents management in litigation of employment-related matters, including discrimination, harassment, and retaliation, as well as state and federal wage and hour claims. Jeremy regularly counsels clients on compliance with employment-related laws and on enforcing personnel policies and procedures. Jeremy has extensive experience representing employers in a variety of industries such as financial services, security services, and numerous entertainment and media companies. In addition, Jeremy works with clients on multi-country HR projects involving...

310-312-3283
Alfredo Ortega Civil Litigation Attorney MSK Law Firm
Associate

legal expertise

General civil litigation.

representative matters

Obtained summary judgment on behalf of motion-picture production company and writer/director of one of the highest-grossing movies of all time on claims of breach of contract and fraud by plaintiffs alleging that defendants used their ideas without compensation.

Represented an international consumer electronics company in proposed nationwide class action alleging breaches of express and implied warranties, the Magnuson Moss Act, and state consumer protection statutes in connection with the sale of high definition televisions.

Obtained summary judgment on behalf of employer against a union representing airport employees who signed a petition to get rid of the union, which resulted in the employer withdrawing representation from and terminating its collective bargaining agreement with the union.

Represented employers in wage and hour class actions.

(310) 312-3292