March 21, 2023

Volume XIII, Number 80

Advertisement
Advertisement

March 20, 2023

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis
Advertisement

Hiring of Administrative Law Judges to Change

A recent United States Supreme Court case and new executive order will change the way federal agencies hire administrative law judges (“ALJs”), and together are expected to increase ALJs’ accountability to the heads of their agencies. On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court held in Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission that the SEC’s administrative law judges (ALJs) are “Officers of the United States” who must be appointed, pursuant to the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, by the President, courts of law or a head of a department. The SEC’s staff members (rather than the Commission) had been appointing the agency’s ALJs, which the Court held does not satisfy the constitutional requirement.

The case started when the SEC instituted an administrative proceeding against petitioner Lucia. The ALJ who heard the case determined that Lucia had violated the Investment Advisers Act. On appeal to the SEC, Lucia argued that the ALJ deciding his matter had not been properly appointed, but the SEC rejected the argument, as did the D.C. Circuit.

Lucia filed a petition for certiorari before the Supreme Court. Up until then, the U.S. government had defended the SEC’s position, but in filing its response to Lucia’s petition, the government switched its position and encouraged the Supreme Court to grant review. The Supreme Court therefore appointed an amicus curiae to defend the SEC’s position. As a result of its decision, the Supreme Court decided that Mr. Lucia was entitled to a new hearing, before a different ALJ. The case left open the question of how its ruling affects other administrative judges at other agencies.

Following the Supreme Court’s decision, on July 10, 2018, President Trump issued an executive order that changes the process by which federal agencies select ALJs, which has typically involved the Office of Personnel Management (“OPM”) screening ALJs based on fixed criteria, including performance on a civil service exam, and hiring ALJs within the competitive service. Under President Trump’s order, federal agencies will make their own hiring decisions and not use the OPM screening process, and will appoint ALJs under the excepted service. An OPM memorandum issued with the executive order clarifies that the order applies only to new appointments beginning July 10, 2018, and incumbent ALJs will remain in the competitive service so long as they remain in their current positions.

© 2023 Covington & Burling LLPNational Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 197
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Lily Hines, Covington, intellectual property attorney
Associate

Lily Hines focuses her practice on licensing and other commercial transactions related to intellectual property and technology. She also has considerable background providing intellectual property counsel and support in connection with large mergers and acquisitions, which continues to inform her approach to commercial matters. Prior to entering law practice, Ms. Hines clerked for a federal district court judge.

212-841-1077
Randy Benjenk, Covington Burling, Regulatory attorney
Associate

Randy Benjenk helps clients navigate the bank regulatory landscape. He represents domestic and foreign financial institutions and trade associations on a variety of bank regulatory issues, including compliance, government affairs, and transactional matters.

Mr. Benjenk regularly advises clients on compliance with provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Bank Holding Company Act, the Change in Bank Control Act and U.S. and international capital and liquidity regulations.

Mr. Benjenk represents financial institutions...

202-662-5041
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement