July 1, 2022

Volume XII, Number 182

Advertisement
Advertisement

July 01, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 30, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 29, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

June 28, 2022

Subscribe to Latest Legal News and Analysis

A New Protected Class? Not Quite, but the EEOC Is Looking Out for Workers with Caregiving Obligations

On March 14, 2022, the EEOC issued a technical assistance document, The COVID-19 Pandemic and Caregiver Discrimination Under Federal Employment Discrimination Lawswhich provides guidance as to ways equal employment opportunity laws enforced by the EEOC (“EEO laws”) may apply to caregivers. In conjunction with this, the EEOC added a Section I (“Caregivers/Family Responsibilities”)  to “What You Should Know About COVID-19,” its primary COVID-19 related guidance document. Enforcement guidance issued by the EEOC in 2007, previously addressed circumstances in which discrimination against caregivers might constitute unlawful disparate treatment. The EEOC has issued this new guidance in response to how the COVID-19 pandemic has particularly affected employees with caregiver responsibilities.

While “caregiver” is not a protected class per se, the EEOC has adopted the term “caregiver discrimination” and explains:

Caregiver discrimination violates the laws enforced by the EEOC if it is based on an applicant’s or employee’s sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), race, national origin, disability, age (40 or older), or another characteristic covered by federal employment discrimination laws. Caregiver discrimination also is unlawful if it is based on the caregiver’s association with an individual with a disability, or on the race, ethnicity, or other protected characteristic of the individual receiving care.

The new guidance materials, both presented in the form of FAQs, discuss various scenarios in which easily drawn and even well intentioned assumptions about employees with caregiving duties could lead to illegal discrimination or harassment. Examples provided by the EEOC include:

  • Associational discrimination against a worker who has a family member with a disability;

  • Gender discrimination against a male worker by failing to provide caregiving leave, flexible work arrangements, or exceptions to return-to-work policies on a gender neutral basis;

  • General discrimination by refusing to hire or promote a female employee based on assumptions that she would be primarily focused on caring for her young children;

  • Pregnancy discrimination by refusing to employ a pregnant employee based on the belief the employee would be (or should be) primarily focused on a safe and healthy pregnancy, not work;

  • Pregnancy discrimination by unilaterally requiring a pregnant employee to telework, or adjusting the employee’s schedule to reduce contact with customers and colleagues, even if motivated by a desire to keep the employee safe;

  • Race discrimination by only requiring workers of a certain race to seek requests for leave in advance, while allowing workers of other races to make requests without notice;

  • Age discrimination by unilaterally determining that an employee above a particular age should work exclusively from home due to concerns about their health;

  • Unlawful hostile work environment by accusing female employees, without justification, of being preoccupied with keeping their families safe from COVID-19, distracted from their professional obligations, and insufficiently committed to their jobs, or criticizing or ridiculing male employees for seeking to perform, or performing, caregiving duties, such as taking leave to care for a child who is quarantining after potential COVID-19 exposure, or limiting overtime or overnight travel, based on gender stereotypes of men as breadwinners and women as caretakers.

The issuance of this guidance signals that the EEOC will be receptive to complaints of discrimination by individuals who believe that the demands of their caregiving responsibilities have influenced employers’ decisions about them, or who believe that they have been targets of harassment because of their caregiver responsibilities. Employers may, therefore, want to consider implementing the EEOC’s best practices suggestions, including:

  • Training managers about the legal obligations that may impact decisions about treatment of workers with caregiving responsibilities;

  • Creating and distributing a policy addressing the types of conduct that might constitute unlawful discrimination or retaliation against caregivers (including defining the term “caregivers”);

  • Informing managers of the employer’s work-life policies, so they can be familiar with them and supportive employees taking advantage of them; and

  • Examining hiring, retention, and termination practices to determine whether they may disadvantage employees with caregiver responsibilities.

©2022 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. All rights reserved.National Law Review, Volume XII, Number 80
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement

About this Author

Lauri F. Rasnick, epstein becker green, new york, labor, employment
Member

LAURI F. RASNICK is a Member of the Firm in the Labor and Employment practice in the firm's New York office.

Ms. Rasnick has significant experience representing employers in labor and employment matters. She regularly advises clients in many aspects of the employment relationship, including avoidance of litigation, employee terminations, disability and religious accommodation issues, wage and hour compliance, internal investigations, labor relations, and compliance with federal, state and local statutes. Ms. Rasnick frequently...

212-351-4854
Susan Gross Sholinsky, Labor Employment Attorney, Epstein Becker Green Law Firm
Member of the Firm

SUSAN GROSS SHOLINSKY is a Member of the Firm in the Labor and Employment practice, in the New York office of Epstein Becker Green. She counsels clients on a variety of matters, in a practical and straightforward manner, with an eye toward reducing the possibility of employment-related claims. In 2013, Ms. Sholinsky was named to theNew York Metro Rising Stars list in the area of Employment & Labor.

212-351-4789
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement